Author Topic: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs  (Read 6783 times)

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #100 on: April 03, 2020, 04:27:08 AM »
Looks like I found the answer

https://www.microsemi.com/document-portal/doc_download/14696-igbt-tutorial

Pages 2-3 say that high collector current could cause the IGBT to latch on.

I'm wondering if I should go back to using 100nf for primary capacitor since the primary current rises really fast
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 05:42:31 AM by ritaismyconscience »

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #101 on: April 04, 2020, 05:37:11 AM »
Got it to work at full voltage without blowing up. Set overcurrent to 500A.



I'm only getting 1 foot arcs, which means that my coil is probably a bit out of tune.

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #102 on: April 04, 2020, 08:01:11 PM »
Yes, for 500A and ~150kHz, 100nF MMC is probably better.  Hopefully that will increase your arc length.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #103 on: April 06, 2020, 05:09:29 AM »
Looks like you're right.

Tested at half voltage, already working really well. Will have to go somewhere bigger to test.

Edit: This one's probably better. Moved the breakout point up a bit so it doesn't get cut off by the door.


Thanks for your help davekni!
« Last Edit: April 06, 2020, 05:44:20 AM by ritaismyconscience »

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #104 on: April 06, 2020, 06:23:27 PM »
Great to see success!  When you can test in a larger space, you'll find that higher pulse repetition rate extends the streamer length well beyond that of single pulses.  Hopefully everything is robust enough to handle higher rates for an impressive show.

You are certainly welcome.  I'm glad to have been of help.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #105 on: April 07, 2020, 10:24:16 PM »
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why 100nF works better than 200nF?

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #106 on: April 07, 2020, 10:54:57 PM »
Yes.  For your fixed frequency and fixed 500A current limit, 100nF has twice the impedance, so twice the primary voltage and twice the primary energy.  It also takes longer to ramp up to the 500A limit.  The short ramp at 200nF may not be long enough for the primary energy to transfer to the secondary, besides having less primary energy available to transfer.

Are you still hitting your 500A limit on most pulses?  If so, even lower than 100nF might be better.  Of course, going lower requires your primary to handle higher voltage.  An arc across the primary coil will destroy IGBTs when the MMC suddenly discharges into the H-bridge.  Also be careful of running longer pulses, as the IGBTs may not handle just under 500A for the longer times.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #107 on: April 08, 2020, 01:05:28 AM »
I'm already tripping the 500A limit at around half voltage. I'll try reducing the tank capacitor to 50nF.

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #108 on: April 08, 2020, 04:15:12 AM »
50nF sounds good, but do be careful to have sufficient voltage capability.  At 150kHz, 50nF has 21.2 ohms impedance, so will have 10.6kV at 500A.  Plan for at least 12kV to have margin for any delay in over-current shutdown.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #109 on: April 10, 2020, 05:19:24 AM »
I changed it to 50nF and it seems to work better. Haven't tested it at half voltage yet.

Some pictures:







I guess one of the things I could change is moving the FB and CT coils onto the lower voltage side of the MMC. However that means my leads have to be longer.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2020, 07:36:46 AM by ritaismyconscience »

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #110 on: April 10, 2020, 09:15:17 PM »
Yes, the current transformers should definitely be on one of the H-Bridge outputs, not on the MMC-to-primary connection!  Don't want to rely on CT insulation holding up to 10-12kV!  CT lead length isn't as critical as for gate-drive, but I'd  still suggest seeing if you can rearrange your layout to keep leads short.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #111 on: April 18, 2020, 05:51:48 AM »
It seems like there's a few problems with my phase lead circuit. First of all, at low currents(~40A), the duty cycle is a few percent less than 50 because one of the diodes (the one connected to 0V) clamps more often than the other. Also, my circuit seems to also be current dependent (higher current results in smaller phase lead). I'll probably have to adjust it while testing at higher current.

I can't use the other circuit for phase lead because the rising and falling edges are not really steep, and the extra time it takes to reach the HIGH threshold basically offsets the phase lead.

edit: tried measuring, ended up having a spark form between primary and oscilloscope probe. Nothing broke (pretty sure there's a MOV inside the oscilloscope that saved it)
« Last Edit: April 18, 2020, 06:18:30 AM by ritaismyconscience »

Offline Mads Barnkob

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Expert
  • *****
  • Posts: 1397
  • Karma: +23/-0
  • Denmark
    • View Profile
    • Kaizer Power Electronics
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #112 on: April 22, 2020, 09:19:36 AM »
Yes, the current transformers should definitely be on one of the H-Bridge outputs, not on the MMC-to-primary connection!  Don't want to rely on CT insulation holding up to 10-12kV!  CT lead length isn't as critical as for gate-drive, but I'd  still suggest seeing if you can rearrange your layout to keep leads short.

The current transformers (FB/OCD) should be on the primary lead from inverter to primary coil. As Dave mentions, between primary coil and MMC there is a very high voltage present due to resonant LC voltage ring up. But even on the inverter to MMC connection you have some higher voltages than on the other leg.

It seems like there's a few problems with my phase lead circuit. First of all, at low currents(~40A), the duty cycle is a few percent less than 50 because one of the diodes (the one connected to 0V) clamps more often than the other. Also, my circuit seems to also be current dependent (higher current results in smaller phase lead). I'll probably have to adjust it while testing at higher current.

I can't use the other circuit for phase lead because the rising and falling edges are not really steep, and the extra time it takes to reach the HIGH threshold basically offsets the phase lead.

edit: tried measuring, ended up having a spark form between primary and oscilloscope probe. Nothing broke (pretty sure there's a MOV inside the oscilloscope that saved it)

40A or low test voltages are not sufficient for testing a Tesla coil. You need to have the system in a state of consistent energy transfer where different components minimum values for "linear" behavior is met. Like low voltages across a IGBT gives you a much higher output impedance or feedback signal is too weak for the driver to properly lock on in the heavy EMI.

Some 100-200 VDC bus and at least 100-200A in the primary circuit to even begin to think about looking at phase lead, you just risk adjusting the phase lead for the low voltage test conditions that are far from what you see at full power. Often you have your primary circuit detuned lower for longest sparks, as the secondary circuit goes down in frequency as the sparks grow longer (presenting a capacitive load).

You need to use a differential probe when measuring on inverter outputs to avoid damaging your oscilloscope. You risk high voltage transients or grounding the power circuit through your probe.
http://www.kaizerpowerelectronics.dk - Tesla coils, high voltage, pulse power, audio and general electronics

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #113 on: April 23, 2020, 12:38:24 AM »
Mads,
When you said "But even on the inverter to MMC connection you have some higher voltages than on the other leg.", are you referring to the other H-Bridge leg?  Hopefully the two H-Bridge outputs have the same voltage (180 degrees out-of-phase) or some electronics has fried.  The only difference that comes to mind is parasitic wiring inductance and the MMC's parasitic capacitance to ground, which wouldn't matter if the CT is close to the H-Bridge.

Separately, ritaismyconscience, have you measured your scope probe input impedance?  I had a probe fry in a way that it still functioned, except that it had about 600 ohms from tip to ground.  Took a while and some confusion on my part to figure out the probe issue.  Was initially using it probing a low-impedance signal source, so didn't notice any problem.  Moved it to a higher-impedance node, and results got confusing for a while.
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #114 on: April 23, 2020, 06:08:02 AM »
Checked and no change in impedance. Think I got lucky becuase I accidentally left it on 50 ohms when it hit. Anyways my scope should have input protection (it's fairly old though).

I measured the voltage by insulating a section with tape and putting a wire next to it (basically I made a capacitive dropper). It ended up arcing over an inch around the tape and onto the probe, but nothing bad happened. Also, I'm having a bit of trouble determining the phase lead with the current setup because the current ramps up in a few cycles and just stays there, and during the part where the current is constant, I can't really tell when the IGBTs are switching and when they aren't. It just looks like a normal sine wave.

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #115 on: April 23, 2020, 10:28:17 PM »
That inch arc explains why current-sense transformers should be on one of the H-Bridge outputs and not on the MMC-primary junction. :)

For phasing, if one channel is measuring current, you need another measuring H-Bridge output voltage.  Using a single probe works when measuring the MMC-primary junction (capacitively since you don't have a HV probe).  Perhaps you should put a small glass jar (or test tube or ...) over the end of the probe for better insulation.  That capacitive-coupling probe method is for high-impedance scope input.  With 50 ohm scope input, you'd get the derivative of the voltage (high-pass-filter).
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #116 on: April 25, 2020, 07:26:37 AM »


Think I got phase lead set correctly



Here's my setup. I probed the H-bridge to Primary wire.

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #117 on: April 25, 2020, 07:51:57 PM »
Is that a current or voltage waveform?  If current, the only slight glitch that might indicate switching time is at peak current rather than zero.  If a voltage waveform, the H-Bridge output should be a square-wave, not a sine wave.  The sine-wave voltage I'd suggested probing for phasing is at the MMC-to-primary node, probed through good insulation (ie. small glass jar).
David Knierim

Offline ritaismyconscience

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #118 on: April 25, 2020, 08:30:43 PM »
I'm measuring voltage, not current. I think I probed the two H bridge outputs with the method you described, and one of them looks like the sum of a square and sine wave, and the other just looks like a sine wave.

Offline davekni

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
  • Karma: +22/-0
  • Physicist, engineer (electronic), and hobbiest
    • View Profile
Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #119 on: April 26, 2020, 02:04:23 AM »
Both H-Bridge outputs should be square waves, except for the vary tail end of ring-down after a burst ends.  The sine + square is the junction between MMC and primary coil.  That's where the voltage is high and you can get the 1" arc, so why good insulation is necessary.
David Knierim

High Voltage Forum

Re: GDT keeps on killing IGBTs
« Reply #119 on: April 26, 2020, 02:04:23 AM »

 


* Recent Topics and Posts

post Re: Russian voltage multiplicator stacking
[Voltage Multipliers]
ritaismyconscience
Today at 07:09:09 AM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
ritaismyconscience
Today at 06:02:30 AM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
MRMILSTAR
Today at 05:14:40 AM
post Re: Russian voltage multiplicator stacking
[Voltage Multipliers]
davekni
Today at 03:54:03 AM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
Today at 03:48:54 AM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
ritaismyconscience
Today at 01:03:12 AM
post Russian voltage multiplicator stacking
[Voltage Multipliers]
nix85
May 30, 2020, 11:50:10 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
Weston
May 30, 2020, 11:37:54 PM
post Re: Portable Q(uarantine)CW Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Weston
May 30, 2020, 11:32:37 PM
post Servomex CO2 analyser
[Electronic Circuits]
Mads Barnkob
May 30, 2020, 11:06:18 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
Bradselph
May 30, 2020, 10:14:21 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
Weston
May 30, 2020, 08:33:05 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
Bradselph
May 30, 2020, 07:08:49 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
Mads Barnkob
May 30, 2020, 05:26:49 PM
post Re: Portable Q(uarantine)CW Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Uspring
May 30, 2020, 05:25:45 PM
post Re: Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
MRMILSTAR
May 30, 2020, 04:31:14 PM
post Site Info desperately needed: http://www.stevehv.4hv.org/
[General Chat]
HighVoltageRulezz
May 30, 2020, 02:05:07 PM
post Re: CT performance investigations (Pearson and DIY)
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Hydron
May 30, 2020, 09:46:46 AM
post Re: CT performance investigations (Pearson and DIY)
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
klugesmith
May 30, 2020, 08:34:58 AM
post Re: CT performance investigations (Pearson and DIY)
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Hydron
May 29, 2020, 11:22:22 PM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
davekni
May 29, 2020, 08:53:35 PM
post Re: CT performance investigations (Pearson and DIY)
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
klugesmith
May 29, 2020, 08:25:06 PM
post Re: CT performance investigations (Pearson and DIY)
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
sgtraf
May 29, 2020, 05:42:45 PM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Magneticitist
May 29, 2020, 04:13:50 PM
post Re: Portable Q(uarantine)CW Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Weston
May 29, 2020, 10:50:36 AM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
jockoFergy
May 29, 2020, 08:46:27 AM
post Re: New projet OmegaDR
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
May 29, 2020, 12:00:26 AM
post Re: New projet OmegaDR
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Mugi30
May 28, 2020, 11:40:37 PM
post Re: New projet OmegaDR
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Mads Barnkob
May 28, 2020, 11:29:00 PM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic Circuits]
petespaco
May 28, 2020, 10:33:50 PM
post Re: New projet OmegaDR
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Mugi30
May 28, 2020, 10:07:59 PM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Magneticitist
May 28, 2020, 09:39:53 PM
post Re: 4kJ wire explosions from 2500uF/2kV Maxwell Energy Discharge Capacitor
[Capacitor Banks]
haversin
May 28, 2020, 03:55:56 PM
post 4kJ wire explosions from 2500uF/2kV Maxwell Energy Discharge Capacitor
[Capacitor Banks]
Mads Barnkob
May 28, 2020, 10:25:50 AM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
davekni
May 28, 2020, 04:59:02 AM
post Re: MMC for a 32kvac load
[Capacitor Banks]
davekni
May 28, 2020, 04:32:26 AM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Rowdy
May 28, 2020, 04:12:23 AM
post Re: MMC for a 32kvac load
[Capacitor Banks]
Rowdy
May 28, 2020, 03:41:17 AM
post Re: MMC for a 32kvac load
[Capacitor Banks]
Rowdy
May 28, 2020, 03:40:25 AM
post Re: SSTC Micro
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
jockoFergy
May 28, 2020, 02:42:23 AM
post Re: Portable Q(uarantine)CW Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Uspring
May 27, 2020, 06:21:39 PM
post Re: Improving IGBT gate drive
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
fnordest
May 27, 2020, 12:11:06 PM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Max
May 27, 2020, 11:51:19 AM
post Re: MMC for a 32kvac load
[Capacitor Banks]
davekni
May 26, 2020, 07:55:03 PM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
May 26, 2020, 07:40:48 PM
post Re: Working Principle Of Neon Transformer Circuit
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
iraquois
May 26, 2020, 05:12:42 PM
post Re: Building a bigger DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Max
May 26, 2020, 03:57:04 PM
post Re: XRay Tank- any ideas about what is inside
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
Mads Barnkob
May 26, 2020, 01:52:26 PM
post Re: Blew my first MOSFET, but it seems like it shouldn't have blown the way it did
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
T3sl4co1l
May 26, 2020, 11:52:33 AM
post Re: XRay Tank- any ideas about what is inside
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
HighVoltageRulezz
May 26, 2020, 09:40:52 AM

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal