Author Topic: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?  (Read 204 times)

Offline nabzim

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • My full name is Adam Baltazar Mizban. Hello there!
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« on: February 18, 2019, 05:06:18 AM »
OK. So we are all familiar with the standard method of primary-strike protection, that is, connecting the RF-ground to the negative DC Bus via capacitive-coupling...
I have come to the realization, that this does NOT make sense.

If a streamer strikes your primary coil, the streamer-current must travel through one/both of your low-side IGBT's (full bridge), or through your low-side IGBT and/or Bus Capacitor (half bridge) to get from the Primary coil to the -Vbus rail.

Why is it not instead the standard to capacitively-couple the RF-ground directly to the Primary Coil? (a.k.a. the center-point, between high-side and low-side IGBT's)
This would keep the high-energy current from traveling through the semiconductor.

Are my assumptions here correct? If there is any logical reasoning behind the standard grounding-scheme (other than copying Steve Ward), then can someone please educate me? ???

Offline Hydron

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 216
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2019, 08:44:19 AM »
Coupling the non-MMC end of the primary would put a significant load on the bridge - take a look at the impedance of the typical coupling caps (e.g. 0.1uF) at the switching frequency. I suspect it would also cause EMI and safety issues, as any current through this capacitor would have to flow via the mains wiring to wherever the earth-neutral bond point is.

Given that the issue doesn't seem to be the strike current (on the order of a few amps only) flowing through the igbts (which have anti parallel diodes included to provide a path when off) but was more about voltage stress between the bridge and heatsink (ground) when hit, the standard method seems to do the trick.

Offline Teravolt

  • High Voltage Experimenter
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2019, 09:25:24 PM »
adding beafy varistors from the primary to ground should increase robustness and a decent strike rail to ground is common practice hear

Offline nabzim

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • My full name is Adam Baltazar Mizban. Hello there!
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2019, 08:33:48 AM »
Coupling the non-MMC end of the primary would put a significant load on the bridge - take a look at the impedance of the typical coupling caps (e.g. 0.1uF) at the switching frequency. I suspect it would also cause EMI and safety issues, as any current through this capacitor would have to flow via the mains wiring to wherever the earth-neutral bond point is.

Given that the issue doesn't seem to be the strike current (on the order of a few amps only) flowing through the igbts (which have anti parallel diodes included to provide a path when off) but was more about voltage stress between the bridge and heatsink (ground) when hit, the standard method seems to do the trick.
Thank you. I'm most likely going with the negative rail.

Offline nabzim

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • My full name is Adam Baltazar Mizban. Hello there!
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube Channel
Re: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2019, 08:47:41 AM »
adding beafy varistors from the primary to ground should increase robustness and a decent strike rail to ground is common practice hear

MOV's in addition to the capacitor? and in parallel, I'm assuming?

Grounded strike rail is a certainty! It sure comes in handy on my spark-gap coil: youtu.be/3d4ZDvA5Kcc   

High Voltage Forum

Re: Primary-Strike Protection Grounding Scheme - Insanity?
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2019, 08:47:41 AM »

 


* Recent Topics and Posts

post Re: GDT Experiments
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Teravolt
March 20, 2019, 11:15:50 PM
post Re: GDT Experiments
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 20, 2019, 09:07:04 PM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Teravolt
March 20, 2019, 05:18:07 PM
post Re: New small SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Bambinz
March 20, 2019, 03:52:15 PM
post Re: New small SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
March 20, 2019, 01:23:52 PM
post Re: GDT Experiments
[Solid state Tesla coils]
T3sl4co1l
March 20, 2019, 01:18:29 PM
post Re: GDT Experiments
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
March 20, 2019, 01:06:24 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
March 20, 2019, 01:00:46 PM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
Mads Barnkob
March 20, 2019, 12:41:22 PM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Thunderstruck
March 19, 2019, 10:02:41 PM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Hydron
March 19, 2019, 08:14:33 PM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Teravolt
March 19, 2019, 05:12:03 PM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General chatting]
Experimentonomen
March 19, 2019, 01:32:32 PM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General chatting]
Mads Barnkob
March 19, 2019, 12:20:34 PM
post Re: Strange gdt waveforms
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
March 19, 2019, 12:15:22 PM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
March 19, 2019, 10:46:50 AM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Thunderstruck
March 19, 2019, 09:11:09 AM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Mads Barnkob
March 19, 2019, 08:24:31 AM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Teravolt
March 19, 2019, 01:51:51 AM
post Re: Keep or throw away ?
[Beginners]
Thunderstruck
March 18, 2019, 09:56:42 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Weston
March 18, 2019, 07:55:52 PM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
petespaco
March 18, 2019, 06:11:07 PM
post Re: Strange gdt waveforms
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
March 18, 2019, 02:27:35 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Uspring
March 18, 2019, 12:52:35 PM
post Re: Strange gdt waveforms
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
FilipŠebík
March 18, 2019, 12:22:58 PM
post New small SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Bambinz
March 18, 2019, 11:46:18 AM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General chatting]
Bambinz
March 18, 2019, 11:29:02 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
Mads Barnkob
March 18, 2019, 10:35:04 AM
post Re: Strange gdt waveforms
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Marty
March 18, 2019, 05:32:43 AM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General chatting]
Experimentonomen
March 17, 2019, 09:13:47 PM
post Re: DRSSTC Driver Logic
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
March 17, 2019, 04:08:33 PM
post Re: WTB: Large Heatsink with a Baseplate at least 10mm thick
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Phoenix
March 17, 2019, 02:46:44 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
flyglas
March 17, 2019, 02:21:45 PM
post Re: DRSSTC Driver Logic
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Laci
March 17, 2019, 01:54:47 PM
post Re: WTB: Large Heatsink with a Baseplate at least 10mm thick
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Mads Barnkob
March 17, 2019, 10:15:16 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
FilipŠebík
March 17, 2019, 09:33:50 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Teravolt
March 17, 2019, 05:32:48 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 17, 2019, 02:39:25 AM
post WTB: Large Heatsink with a Baseplate at least 10mm thick
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Phoenix
March 16, 2019, 10:06:39 PM
post Re: Large Ferrite Core with IGBT-Brick Driver
[Transformer (ferrite core)]
rikkitikkitavi
March 16, 2019, 08:35:51 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Weston
March 16, 2019, 08:04:52 PM
post Re: cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
flyglas
March 16, 2019, 06:44:14 PM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
FilipŠebík
March 16, 2019, 09:57:55 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 16, 2019, 09:40:55 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
FilipŠebík
March 16, 2019, 08:57:54 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 16, 2019, 08:46:24 AM
post Re: Which varnish to use to coat the Secondary?
[Solid state Tesla coils]
FilipŠebík
March 16, 2019, 08:27:24 AM
post Re: UD 2.7C Build
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 16, 2019, 07:35:58 AM
post GDT Experiments
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Thunderstruck
March 16, 2019, 06:32:36 AM
post cute-qcw Tesla Coil
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Weston
March 16, 2019, 06:01:44 AM

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30