I am a bit lost too, that is why I asked

Not finnished with my book yet but I will try to explain why we "modern" people fail to find the connection.

Humas are notoriously lazy and happy for a long time once they created something great.

Take the car....

We observed nature and the universe for our first big inventions like the wheel.

Later we found more and more things in nature that are important but wee needed a way to express, understand and to put into into a language.

Math was "discovered" - it tanslates what can see, feel and hear in nature into something we can handle.

One and one makes two...

two times two equals four...

Add decimal parity and most basic math already forks fine.

Later we needed stuff like volumes, areas, angles to "invent" more complext structures and technology.

As a result all we know from nature was put into relating formulas, sequences, "fixed" numbers.

The laws of physics, the golden ratio, binary systems and parity, Fibonacci sequence, sine waves!

But the lazy human stopped evolving math the same way he discovered the connections in nature through observation.

The "simple" math was just expanded by more and more complex formulas.

We tried and still try to understand the energy triangle in nature but at least Einsten found the formula E=MC² to put it into a mathematically useful form.

No matter what, math will always be our translator for nature.

So a lot of possible pathways that nature provides us allow us to theorise about how things should be and develop technology to make it real.

Or to fail and find out where our math was wrong.

Technology however is based on the same flawed math that we simplyfied and now no longer care about but we invented calculators and computers to do it for us.

We used to visualise math back in the days...

Ruler like calculators to use sliders to show the relations in trigonometry.

tables to show us relations between certain sequences and fixed numbers like Pi and other "constants".

We ignore nature and also lost the visual aids that previously helped because using modern technolgy is faster.

We learn more and more to unlearn math by making it easier to use it.

And our modern understanding of technology does the same to us.

We copied the binary system from nature to create calculators but we ignored to add harmony and resonance to it

And because we are lazy we also reduced the basic function to ZERO and ONE instead of including our well know laws of physics, seqeunces and harmonic spirals.

It works, so why bother, we just write enough code to compensate and again base it on the already lazy and flawed math that has lost harmony and resonance.

If Einstein and Tesla worked together as close as history make us think then they obviously exchanged ideas and theories.

If you put our understand of the most basic math into a circle then we end up with the energy triangle 369, the parity numbers 1, 2, 4, 8, 7, 5 and two circles that also form a perfect sine wave.

Both genius minds had the same common language: math.

One was driven to explain energy, the other tried to understand harmony and resonance and invented electricity to prove his version.

If math is the common language (like we learned a second language like french in school) than the the other tow, energy and harmony/resonance can be translated.

Of course there will always things that get a bit out of context or just won't ranslate properly.

We know that when we try use online service to translate lets say a chinese website...

So it is no wonder they both came to their big breakthroughs around the same time...

And is we look really close....

E=MC² ,C is the speed of light, a "fixed" number.

It is also a frequency, a wavelenght, energy...

It is harmonic and resonant.

Einstein might have failed to explain why C² is the same as mass, but 369 shows mass is nothing but a form of energy.

He explained the triangle without putting E M and C onto the corresponding 3, 6 and 9.

He was happy to have solved it, we just needed to figure it out too

But if C and M are both the same, the opposite and their sum then harmony and resonance can replace both for the use in math.

And for electricity in harmony and resonance it means there is no loss, there is no chaos.

And in a resonant system all energies would amplify.

Since at this stage it would still lack the parity harmony and resonace translate the missing link.

This explains why Tesla was also obsessed with the ratios 1/4 and 3/4 - which becomes obvious once you bring the sine wave, or Yin and Yang in relation to 369.

And for those simple above reasons I came to the conclusion that a transformer as in Tesla's late patent is only half of the patent.

It can only work with a tuned Tesla transformer as the power source.

And it has to be in a 1/4 3/4 ratio to work as described in the patent.

There is no way around it with math and E=MC².

Both system must share two links.

The topload of the power source and the individual RF fields from both individual transformer.

Otherwise 369 would not be complete as in E=MC².

And Yin and Yang or our sine wave just proves it

Or why else would Tesla have made the step from mechanical resonance (mass) to electrical?

Mass is energy, so invent AC electricity as a form of energy to replace it.

Quite obvious if you thing about it the way nature shows us, instead of using a flawed math system to understand it