Author Topic: Calculating Hard-Switching losses  (Read 915 times)

Offline Phoenix

  • High Voltage Experimenter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« on: July 31, 2018, 05:37:45 PM »
Hello  :)

I would like to calculate the maximum frequency i can drive an IGBT-Brick within its thermal limitation. I am using SKM200GB128D Bricks.

I am calculating the losses for 180A Hardswitching and a frequency of 20kHz. I need to find out the turn on/off energy first using the datasheet.


And here is my question: When reading the energy of the chart, do i need to use the 180A of current or the change of current (dI/dt)? The change of current would only be around 22.6A/µs high for 180A at 20kHz, which would result in much lower turn on/off energies.

Greetings,
Phoenix


Offline Mads Barnkob

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Expert
  • *****
  • Posts: 1048
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Denmark
    • View Profile
    • Kaizer Power Electronics
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2018, 06:54:55 PM »
It is your peak current, that is how I calculated it for soft-switching here: http://kaizerpowerelectronics.dk/tesla-coils/drsstc-design-guide/igbts/

I guess you can use my example all the way through, just ignore the reduction factors for resonant switching that I use :)
http://www.kaizerpowerelectronics.dk - Tesla coils, high voltage, pulse power, audio and general electronics

Offline Phoenix

  • High Voltage Experimenter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2018, 08:06:16 PM »
Thank you for your reply  :)

I have already followed your guide for the calculations but i am stuck at that point. In this application i am only switching  an inductive load, which results in a triangular waveform. The IGBT's always switch at the peaks of this waveform (180A). There is no resonance circuit, so the IGBT's always switch at full current. Because of that, i think i have to read the chart at 180A of current. But if i read the chart at the operating current, i can't keep up with the manufacturers claim of 220A at 20kHz with a junction temperature of 150°C and a case temperature of 80°C. Here are my calculations:


As you see i am only able to switch at a maximum frequency of 8.462kHz but according to the datasheet the bricks should be able to switch 20kHz at 220A.

Is there something wrong with my calculations?

Edit: I just tried something new and i think i have found the problem: A square wave has a RMS-Factor of 1, but a triangular wave only has a factor of 0,577. The maximum current rating in the datasheet is for DC, so there are no switching losses included. If i put in the numbers for 127A (220*0,577) into the equations, the result is 23,462 kHz and it should work for my inverter. Could this result be correct?

Greetings,
Phoenix
« Last Edit: July 31, 2018, 08:54:19 PM by Phoenix »

Offline Mads Barnkob

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Expert
  • *****
  • Posts: 1048
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Denmark
    • View Profile
    • Kaizer Power Electronics
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2018, 09:24:55 PM »
I was just about to mention that, just like I had to reduce for soft-switching short pulses, as hard-switching is seen as a square wave, a triangle waveform would also have to use a reduction factor, but you already figured that out :)
http://www.kaizerpowerelectronics.dk - Tesla coils, high voltage, pulse power, audio and general electronics

Offline Phoenix

  • High Voltage Experimenter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2018, 10:27:35 PM »
I have now used the reduction factor for my 180A which gives me about 104A RMS. I used the RMS value for the CE Voltage and in the calculation for the conduction losses. But i have not used it for the turn on/off energy, because the IGBT still has to switch the 180A peak.

According to my calculations, if the junction has a temperature of 125°C and the Case has a temperature of 50°C, i can run my Inverter up to 20,6kHz. I also converted the equation to tell me the temperature difference between junction and case, at 20kHz the difference would be 73°C. I could now use a circuit which cuts of the supply voltage to the inverter using a relay, when the case temperature reachs 57°C, so the junction would never get hotter than 130°C  :D

Greetings,
Phoenix
« Last Edit: July 31, 2018, 11:57:15 PM by Phoenix »

Offline rikkitikkitavi

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 17
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2018, 03:44:38 PM »
Just a thought, wouldnt average value instead of RMS be more accurate?

The loss is the integral of the current*voltage across the switching device during the switching event.
A man can not have to many variacs

Offline Phoenix

  • High Voltage Experimenter
  • **
  • Posts: 63
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2018, 04:47:21 PM »
I only used the RMS Value for the calculation of the conduction losses during the ON-State.

For the losses during the switching event, i used the full 180A, because the IGBT's switch at the current maximum.

Offline Hydron

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Engineer
  • *****
  • Posts: 239
  • Karma: +7/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2018, 03:26:03 PM »
Conduction losses for an IGBT should probably be done with the average (mean) current rather than RMS - they behave more like a diode than a resistor in forward conduction. RMS is appropriate for MOSFETs though, and it probably won't make a lot of difference anyway.

High Voltage Forum

Re: Calculating Hard-Switching losses
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2018, 03:26:03 PM »

 


* Recent Topics and Posts

post CM300 coil build questions
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
acobaugh
Today at 05:32:28 AM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :
[General chatting]
ElectroXa
July 20, 2019, 09:45:42 PM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
Bert911
July 19, 2019, 11:19:45 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
hightemp1
July 19, 2019, 03:36:44 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
DICKEYBIRD
July 19, 2019, 03:24:38 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
hightemp1
July 19, 2019, 02:23:29 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
DICKEYBIRD
July 19, 2019, 01:06:44 AM
post Re: Floppiclene! A Electronics Cleaning Relic of the Past.
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
Justin
July 18, 2019, 10:29:32 PM
post Re: Floppiclene! A Electronics Cleaning Relic of the Past.
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
Mads Barnkob
July 18, 2019, 08:52:35 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
hightemp1
July 18, 2019, 05:49:27 AM
post A new quick way to get into tune a DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
VNTC
July 18, 2019, 03:13:27 AM
post Re: Floppiclene! A Electronics Cleaning Relic of the Past.
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
Twospoons
July 18, 2019, 12:06:53 AM
post Re: Help for people buying the "12-48 Volt 1800/2500 Watt ZVS induction Heater"
[Electronic circuits]
hightemp1
July 17, 2019, 07:56:41 PM
post Floppiclene! A Electronics Cleaning Relic of the Past.
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
Mads Barnkob
July 17, 2019, 11:25:22 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
July 16, 2019, 07:39:33 AM
post Re: What is the true in tuning guide?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
VNTC
July 16, 2019, 05:11:21 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
July 16, 2019, 04:05:07 AM
post Re: DRSSTC in brust mode
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
SAMGO
July 16, 2019, 02:25:27 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
July 16, 2019, 01:54:30 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 15, 2019, 02:51:26 PM
post Re: What is the true in tuning guide?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 15, 2019, 02:48:02 PM
post Re: A problem solved with hand tools
[General chatting]
Mads Barnkob
July 15, 2019, 01:48:08 PM
post Re: Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 15, 2019, 01:45:00 PM
post Re: A problem solved with hand tools
[General chatting]
Hydron
July 15, 2019, 11:21:29 AM
post What is the true in tuning guide?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
VNTC
July 15, 2019, 10:01:21 AM
post A problem solved with hand tools
[General chatting]
klugesmith
July 15, 2019, 07:52:41 AM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General chatting]
klugesmith
July 15, 2019, 07:33:30 AM
post Re: tesla coil varnish is dumb
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Hydron
July 14, 2019, 10:49:03 PM
post Re: tesla coil varnish is dumb
[Solid state Tesla coils]
T3sl4co1l
July 14, 2019, 09:59:40 PM
post Re: tesla coil varnish is dumb
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 14, 2019, 08:20:52 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
July 14, 2019, 06:06:30 PM
post tesla coil varnish is dumb
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Fumeaux
July 14, 2019, 05:29:10 PM
post Led Closeups with Mobile phone and lens .
[Smart phones]
DashApple
July 14, 2019, 03:00:09 PM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 14, 2019, 02:06:26 PM
post Re: DRSSTC in brust mode
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 14, 2019, 02:04:22 PM
post Re: Twin System Build
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
oneKone
July 14, 2019, 01:27:18 AM
post Re: DRSSTC in brust mode
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
johnf
July 14, 2019, 01:22:15 AM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
oneKone
July 13, 2019, 03:48:54 PM
post DRSSTC in brust mode
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
SAMGO
July 13, 2019, 04:17:55 AM
post Re: Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
donnersm
July 12, 2019, 08:54:54 PM
post Re: Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
July 12, 2019, 07:16:40 PM
post Re: Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
July 12, 2019, 06:33:00 PM
post Smooth corona or heavy spark, RF wave radiation frequency of Tesla coil drops ve
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
VNTC
July 12, 2019, 11:09:28 AM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 12, 2019, 09:56:38 AM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
oneKone
July 12, 2019, 01:23:58 AM
post Re: Completed my pulsed power generator
[Capacitor banks]
MRMILSTAR
July 11, 2019, 05:48:27 PM
post Re: Completed my pulsed power generator
[Capacitor banks]
Mads Barnkob
July 11, 2019, 02:58:13 PM
post Re: Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
July 11, 2019, 02:45:24 PM
post Kaizer half bridge driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
donnersm
July 11, 2019, 06:59:01 AM
post Completed my pulsed power generator
[Capacitor banks]
MRMILSTAR
July 11, 2019, 05:43:31 AM

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30