Author Topic: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?  (Read 269 times)

Offline Dr.Krieger

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« on: April 22, 2018, 02:18:32 AM »
Hello to all, this is my first but hopefully not last post in this Forum, so nice to meet you :)

The question i would like to ask is simple:
How come (in my limited experience) i have never seen a XμF/400V "motor run" capacitor in use on a SSTC/DRSSTC?


I was looking at an old 1KW Inverter board and i noticed than it used two of those MKP caps, in the classic plastic white can form, right in the middle of 12xIRFP350 MOSFET (output) devices, for snubbing perhaps?
Here is a photo where you can barely see the two white caps, behind that 10.000μF Daewoo cap: https://imgur.com/a/mulGCl7
This however might be a bad example, since the way those MOSFETs are just screwed to the heatsink using a metal-threaded screw right on the aluminium does not show great craftsmanship... :/

As far as i can see these caps could be good for Snubbers or DC blocking in SSTC's, since they are Polypropylene MKP caps rated at 400+ volts (50Hz though) and they are made in values as low as 1μF or even lower (https://images-maplin.wearepentagon.com/3/1577_N38KG.jpg)...
Based on their size compared to the usual MKP caps used, i would say they would do better at least thermally, right?
I don't know how well they would do in high frequencies or with high-current pulses, they just seem so "beefy" to me, compared to the usual "X2" and other MKP types usually used (and at the same or lower price too).

For example, Mads Barnkob's SSTC II uses 2x0.68μF/400Vac MKP X2 caps (=1x1.36μF/400Vav) for DC blocking, while in his DRSSTC III he uses two 2μF/1KV for snubbers.
Could one use a 1-2μF/440Vac Motor Run Capacitor as substitute in the first case and perhaps two (or more) 4μF/440Vac is series for the second?

I 'm not asking because i have something particular in mind, just curious since i saw those white MKP's on that inverter.

Thank you for your time!
« Last Edit: April 22, 2018, 03:17:36 AM by Dr.Krieger »

Offline profdc9

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
    • View Profile
Re: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2018, 03:45:25 PM »
There are several reasons why they're probably not used, even though many are polyproplyene:

1.  Voltage.  You need to string together many of them to get a high enough voltage for even low-voltage DRSSTCs.  It would be difficult to balance the voltage over this many caps, as well as very cumbersome.

2.  Capacitance.  The capacitance is too high.  Again, you have to place many in series to get a decent capacitance.

3.  Form factor.  The capacitors used for snubbers or DRSSTC tend to be axial lead, longer, and thinner, so that these can tolerate a higher peak current.  While the current travels along an axial capacitor, it has to travel up and back through a long radial capacitor.

4.  Average vs. peak current rating.  Snubbers are rated specifically for high peak currents, while motor run capacitors generally are not, because these operate at 50/60 Hz.  This is related to the form factor.

In general, I would say a good capacitor for DRSSTC is rated for at least 630 VDC, but preferably for 2 kVDC or more and can tolerate a voltage rise of 1000 V/us or more, and is polypropylene or mica for low ESR.  Remember, the capacitor is going to be charging and discharging every few microseconds during the pulse!

Dan

Offline Dr.Krieger

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2018, 03:23:37 AM »
Hi profc9,

I assume that in the first two reasons (Voltage and Capacitance) you are referring to the caps used as a "tank caps", in an MMC? I didn't mentioned that use in my first post because i could see how the things you wrote are true. I was thinking of snubbers or DC blockers use only.

I never thought of how the radial vs axial design of the cap would affect the current flow through the cap, i guess this is one of the things that matter when you are pulsing current at KHz frequencies, now i know! Again not talking about MMCs.

The peak current and behavior at high frequencies (ESR/ESL etc) was my main concern like i wrote in the first post, but i thought that there was a good chance they were good with current (at least at 50Hz?) since they seem to be 3-4 times the physical size of "not best-for-this-use but it will work" X2 and similar non-snubber specific MKP caps. Clearly the caps that are actually made for use as Snubbers (and other "pulse-rated" variants) will out-perform all other (cheaper) alternatives, like X2 or other MKP caps.
My reasoning for the current capabilities was my (very limited) experience with DC Electrolytic caps, where two caps can have the same eg 10.000μF/63V rating, but one is a snap-in cap and the other a big-can with screw terminals and 3-4 times the size of the first one. In my, again limited experience, the physically bigger cap will be able to perform better as a smoothing cap in a power supply when it comes to current: the physical smaller cap will get worm and/or not be able to supply the current the big cap has no problem providing.
But DC (100Hz) behavior is not the same as KHz behavior, so i was guessing wrong...

May i make another guess and say that you prefer 2KV rated caps for use as snubbers, because they would last longer in what i assume is a assumed 325V DC bus?
I don't have much experience with resonant circuits and things like that, besides knowing that you will fry stuff if you don't use a freewheeling Diode in a DC Relay and that the collapsing current through a eg 12V DC Relay coil like that, can create a high enough voltage to shock you.
But seeing many (?) small/cheapreasonably-priced coils use X2 or 400-600V caps in parallel to the DC bus, i though that the (very fast) freewheeling diodes* on the MOSFETs/IGBTs where making a good enough job so that a <1KV rated cap was all you needed.
*i mean the extra protection diodes like a MUR1560, not the diodes inside the devices

Anyways, you live and you learn and i am happy about that! :)
« Last Edit: April 23, 2018, 03:34:52 AM by Dr.Krieger »

Offline Mads Barnkob

  • Administrator
  • High Voltage Senior
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
  • Denmark
    • View Profile
    • Kaizer Power Electronics
Re: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2018, 09:43:53 PM »
Hi Dr.Krieger and welcome to HVF!

I actually bought up a lot of motor run MKP capacitors to experiment with, guess what, they are still in a bin somewhere :)

If we take a look at a datasheet ( https://www.alliedelec.com/m/d/0e6caf07b16fd270ab32109f984fd76a.pdf ) for one of these capacitors, there are a few hints as to why they are not to be used for pulse applications, be that high voltage (snubbering) or high current (resonant)

Rated Voltage: Rating is the 50/60Hz RMS voltage for a sinusoidal waveform.
Frequency: 50/60 Hz. For higher frequencies use General Purpose AC Capacitor Series.
Operating Temperature: ­40ºC to +70ºC
Dissipation Factor: 0.1% maximum

Voltage rating is only for sinusoidal waveforms, almost everything other than the resonant current in a DRSSTC is far from that. Frequency rating already here points from the manufacturer to use GP AC capacitors. They have a very low operating temperature to even stay in their expected life time (60000h with 94% survivors). The dissipation factor of 0.1% is high for a mains frequency rated capacitor when you think about what kind of losses it will then see at higher frequencies.

All in all they are just cheaper capacitors with a limited life time quality due to their low temperature tolerance, it was never designed for anything else than being cheap and run a motor :)

That being said, I still want to make a MMC of those I got.
http://www.kaizerpowerelectronics.dk - Tesla coils, high voltage, pulse power, audio and general electronics

Offline Dr.Krieger

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2018, 05:00:00 AM »
Hi Mads, love your coils and web page!

Well i guess that what some say is true, "size doesn't matter"...
Oh well, i guess high-frequency devices require the use of high-frequency specific components XD

Thanks for your input guys :)

High Voltage Forum

Re: Why no one uses MKP "Motor Run" Capacitors?
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2018, 05:00:00 AM »

 


* Recent Topics and Posts

post Re: COUNTERPOISE ??? NEED HELP
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 22, 2018, 10:05:10 PM
post Re: COUNTERPOISE ??? NEED HELP
[Solid state Tesla coils]
antoine_z_h
June 22, 2018, 03:58:34 PM
post Re: COUNTERPOISE ??? NEED HELP
[Solid state Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 22, 2018, 03:09:34 PM
post Re: COUNTERPOISE ??? NEED HELP
[Solid state Tesla coils]
antoine_z_h
June 22, 2018, 02:08:23 PM
post Re: COUNTERPOISE ??? NEED HELP
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 22, 2018, 01:08:08 PM
post Counterpoise? Need help!
[Solid state Tesla coils]
antoine_z_h
June 22, 2018, 12:23:41 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
TDAF
June 22, 2018, 11:03:01 AM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 22, 2018, 09:44:27 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 22, 2018, 09:41:05 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
June 22, 2018, 07:43:29 AM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
oneKone
June 22, 2018, 04:12:56 AM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Teravolt
June 21, 2018, 09:00:40 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 21, 2018, 07:01:55 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Spuriosity_
June 21, 2018, 04:19:06 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 20, 2018, 11:07:26 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 20, 2018, 08:14:29 PM
post Re: CM200DU-24F woes
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Usernametaken
June 20, 2018, 04:28:35 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 20, 2018, 04:08:31 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 20, 2018, 03:15:09 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
June 20, 2018, 02:26:29 PM
post Re: CM200DU-24F woes
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 20, 2018, 11:30:44 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 20, 2018, 11:26:14 AM
post Re: MMC configuration advice
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
zizzer
June 19, 2018, 06:45:59 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
June 19, 2018, 08:14:00 AM
post Re: CM200DU-24F woes
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Usernametaken
June 19, 2018, 07:28:22 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 19, 2018, 03:19:15 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 11:18:56 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
pentode
June 18, 2018, 11:03:47 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 18, 2018, 09:07:28 PM
post Re: The hobo's SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 08:47:15 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 07:39:58 PM
post Re: The hobo's SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 04:36:18 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 04:27:14 PM
post The hobo's SSTC
[Solid state Tesla coils]
Spuriosity_
June 18, 2018, 04:17:13 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 04:07:44 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
pentode
June 18, 2018, 03:32:39 PM
post Re: MMC configuration advice
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 02:02:50 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 01:53:12 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 01:48:11 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 12:41:18 PM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 12:31:42 PM
post Re: Glass and shellac
[Radio frequency]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 12:13:42 PM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Hydron
June 18, 2018, 11:46:44 AM
post Re: Drsstc 3
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Mads Barnkob
June 18, 2018, 11:13:39 AM
post Re: Next Gen DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
Netzpfuscher
June 17, 2018, 08:35:38 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
pentode
June 17, 2018, 01:15:28 PM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
TDAF
June 17, 2018, 01:06:30 PM
post Re: Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
oneKone
June 17, 2018, 12:15:59 PM
post Bach on sparks!
[Vacuum tube Tesla coils]
pentode
June 17, 2018, 09:14:12 AM
post Re: IGBT selection - TO-247 or minibrick?
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils]
profdc9
June 17, 2018, 06:07:55 AM