Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - zytra

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Yes, outer wire current is much higher, as I'd said in reply #7.

The FETs are not conducting that high current, only the center wire current.  The high outer lead currents are conducted from the transformer to the capacitor, not through the FETs.

Definitely simulate any interrupter design before constructing.  You will need some way to handle energy stored in the supply inductor at turn-off.

At higher frequency (ie. gapped core) you can get more volts/turn.  However, secondary intra-winding capacitance becomes more problematic as frequency increases.  Your UY30 ferrite will allow higher volts/turn at the same frequency.

Yes you called it :) it really took the waveforms for me to understand it.
I'd like to keep running with this type of frequencies, so the UY30 ferrite will be welcome to continue pushing on this project.
The secondary wound with 100 turns per chamber has not failed, and none of the early signs of failure have appeared yet (bubbles forming in the secondary).

I installed LTSpice last week and I have to spend more time on it. I was trying to simulate the ZVS on circuit lab last night and couldn't; I tried a bunch of things to create a slight unbalance initially to allow the system to start oscillating but none worked, and it seems like I have the same issue with LTSpice; however with LTSpice if I try for example to change the value of the 470 ohm to try to generate an imbalance, the simulation converges immediately (as opposed to crunching for a long time with tiny time steps). edit: the option "skip initial operating point solution" fixed the problem :)

Good detecting.

Meanwhile I couldn't stop doing the skin effect exercise.
Guessing a frequency of 100 kHz, found that an AC ampere in 14 AWG wire
produces almost as much heating power as a DC ampere in 18 AWG wire.

When your outside wires appeared bright in the thermal infrared image,
were they perceptibly warm to the touch?

Yes, the image was taken after one or two minute only which was more than enough to see the outer wires were hotter. To the touch, you could tell they were warmer but after 10 minutes or so they were hot, while the center tap wire was not even warm.

2
Yes, those bursts make it difficult to see what's going on with the switching, but they're likely a consequence of the switching, not the other way around, so I wont' worry too much about them especially as I intend to clean this up a bit.

Too bad I couldn't get those shots yesterday before the failure. The output is significantly lower than yesterday, I really need to find a way to add turns reliably. And of course I need a suitable enclosure that I can pull vacuum from. I wonder if the later alone would be enough to make those discharges reach the inner surface of the globe.

With the reduced output, adding an interrupter doesn't feel as urgent.



edit: I'm attaching a plot of the center tap line in channel 4. the magnitude of the current in that wire is just plain small compared to what's going on in the other legs. That would seem to be the logical explanation for the thermal image recorded a couple days ago, wouldn't it? The average current on channel 4 roughly equates the numerical value displayed by the PSU (3A), and the currents in the 2 legs although with very large peak to peak value mostly cancel out and equate what's measured in that center tap line. The fet's are switching quite the current on that small circuit, I'm glad I went a bit overkill with those.

3
I added a sharp wire, closed the globe and refilled with argon.
Here's a oscilloscope video showing a voltage ramp from 12 to 30V. Sorry the potentiometer on that PSU is a bit sticky, so that ramp wasn't super gradual. Hopefully it seems like it starts showing signs of saturation around 75V on the drains (~ 24V input). Perhaps it's time to start adding gaps.

/>
Does the zero crossing look normal to you though?


about the parasitic inductance, no doubt - right now, wiring' isn't cleaned up at all as I was figuring out capacitor size and such.

4
Hi,

I rewound the secondary with only 100 turns per chamber for all 16 chambers this time. (down from 150 turns and 15 chambers)
I then proceed with "tuning" the tank capacitor, and found that out of all the caps I have 2 uF gave the best results (2x 1uF in parallel).

I reinstalled the globe and added ~1atm of argon. Sadly, even at 30V I am not longer generating any discharges in the globe. With the voltage being lower by a whooping 33% I was afraid of that.

Technically, my mosfet being rated for 650V I could leave gate resistors on 12V (change the R to 100 ohm) and use a 60V PSU.


I checked everything again this morning regarding the gates and the discrepancy was still present measuring 30V off the PSU. Rebooting the scope fixed the issue.

As for yesterday's current waveform, scaling was off on one of the probes (the outer one i.e. ch 3 cyan, so current was in fact 10 times higher).


I'm attaching 2 screenshots:
- Gates + current (both outer lines)
- Drains + current (both outer lines)

Note that on the second screenshot (Drains + current) there is no corona or discharge (this is with the globe and 1atm of argon). On the first one (Gates + current), I had a sharp wire wrapped around the electrode with 10mm plasma shooting out of the tip.

5
I ordered 7648A42 from mcmaster, which I think is the one with the silicone adhesive you are talking about. It doesn't say 3M but that should be it.
I finally found a LCD resin with good dielectric strength (14kV/mm) so I'll give my original design a shot this week-end. I am pretty hopeful as it really addresses the cross-over wire issue by preventing any contact with any of the upper layers on the new chamber. Oil should have no problem filling up the space around the cross over.


Edit: I've attached an attempt at a (not finished/work in progress) schematic that would:
* add separate supply for the 2 mosfet gates (I need a 12-15V regulator the mosfet driver)
* add a bulk capacitor on the power supply
* add an interrupter circuit (not shown yet I wanted to see if I could get that circuit to simulate first) with a N channel mosfet + driver (I have some UCC37322P) driven by a signal generator on the input (the enable pin would be permanently pulled up)

I am not quite sure if that's a good idea for a ZVS driver generally speaking but I have feeling that it would 1. reduce the stress on the transformer as I'm figuring it out how to no arc, 2. potentially add some cool feature on plasma modulation

6
After taking those plots I verified correct physical connections, multipliers on probes and scope. So unless something was wrong with the probe or scope, that was it. It doesn't help that incidentally, I had the second current probe (Channel 3) on the mosfet that had correct gate plots, and of course I didn't have a third current probe to see them all at once. Tomorrow, I'll double check that once the secondary has been repaired, and reboot the oscilloscope just in case. And once that's resolved I'll switch to probing drains.

My calculations were wrong, which is great because it gives a good reason for that secondary to fail. There is no doubt that the new wire coming down to a new chamber will eventually make contact with one last 30 turns per chamber. The intent was to use Kapton tape to cover that one wire before layering a new chamber but I had a very difficult time getting the tape to stick... Not entirely surprising since I am using one of the best non-stick materials. I got a brand new roll of KT which hopefully will stick better. And since my numbers were off, I think this time I'll stick with 100 turns as I should have. Hopefully I'll find a capacitor that works well with the new secondary inductance.

7
Hi guys,

Well I thought I'd be reporting good news and while I was able to get some results, I'm afraid to report the transformer failed again. Not sure where yet, I'll drain it tomorrow.

It's surprising though, because I decided to rewind with a much more conservative figure of 150 turns per chamber, and still skip that last chamber. 150 turns per chamber would represent roughly 1200V per chamber if it was a simple step up transformer. (I used 2.5 turns for the calculation since technically, only "half the primary" is driving the secondary at a time. (my primary has a total of 5 turns exactly between the 2 ends). I hooked the counter this time and I wanted to do 100 turns (or 800V per chamber) but when I realized that I was probably running 300 turns per chamber before, I thought 150 turns should still be reasonable. Guess not.

So I reinstalled the freshly wound secondary, filled up with oil and went on with tuning. With roughly half the turns compared to before (DC resistance confirmed that at about 175 ohm) I found that 20 uF was way too much and I couldn't get any output. I tried 4.7 uF and it seemed pretty good so I stuck with cap for the rest of the tests. By the way this was with a sharp copper wire wrapped around the threaded rods, right before the brass ball. At this point I took the wire out, and filled up with argon. Everything looked pretty good. Voltage could be raised all the way to 30V this time before hitting the PSU current limit. Before I would be in CC at roughly 17-18V. I was expecting as much with the lower inductance secondary.

I then proceeded with moving the setup to the other side of the lab so I could use the 4 channel oscilloscope, and hooked up everything. I was able to capture a few screenshots and a video before severed arc'ing occured in the secondary. It was too bright to really tell, it could have been between primary and secondary (which I doubt considering the OD of the windings on the secondary is at least 6mm less, hence farther away from the primary, but I'll only know for sure when it's drained in the AM.

Screenshots: they're basically all the same, with a different time scale.
Channel 1 and 2 are gates: I don't understand why there is basically no signal on the channel 1 gate since the system was apparently working.
Channel 3 is a current probe on one of the outer wire coming back from the primary (actually on the Mosfet driven by the gate on channel 2)
Channel 4 is a current probe on the middle wire going to the center tap of the primary (they're not the same current probe, hence the different scales)

Also, don't pay attention to the "measurements" these were setup for the measurements I was taking on the SSTC.

We can clearly the strong DC (~10A) component on Ch4, and strong AC component Ch3.
Frequency's around 16.6 kHz.

Unless my understanding of how these simple ZVS drivers work was even more off, I don't think that gate on channel looks normal. Both channels 1 and 2 are differential probes and both are probing across the diodes in front of the gates.



And here's a video I took a minute or so before the failure (it failed on the next boot up) - sadly, the camera wasn't rolling when it failed.

/>

8
Just to make sure I understand that concept correctly; although the RMS current going in the center of the primary is greater than what flows either side, the heat generated is less because the frequency in this part of the circuit is much less than what it is coming out of the primary, and so the effective section is section (driving the R, and heat up)?

9
Thanks guys, I will redo these measurements.
The numbers I gave you are AC.
I don't recall if I measured the center-tap line in DC but I did for the outer lines and they read 0A.

10
It completely makes sense, the fact the gate resistor was a 2W actually made me wonder, particularly when I realized I didn't have one handy.
Good thing we talk about this because it reminds me of another interesting thing I picked up.

Because I didn't have a 2W resistor (but only 1/4W) I pulled the thermal camera as to not run the system too long. And well yeah these 1/4W resistors do heat up, as expected. However something else caught my attention:

The primary is wired with the positive DC coming straight into the center tap (after the inductor). As such I as expecting that wire to be hotter than the other 2 wires which should only see half the average current. However, the FLIR short revealed the exact opposite. I've attached a screenshot and you can see the 2 outer primary wires being significantly hotter than the center tap wire (it's right in between the 2 outer wires which appear yellow; note: you can see a 4th wire close to the right primary wire - that 4th wire is the secondary lead going to the ground).

That puzzled me, so I pulled the clamp meter (all the other oscilloscopes and probes were still hooked on another experiments) and found numbers that match my expectations!!! roughly 3.5A in the line going to the center tap and 1.6-17 A on both the other wires. All three are from the same spool, machine wire, 14AWG, stranded, and same length +/- 1/4".

I'm sure there's an explanation, but I didn't immediately see one. The clamp is not super accurate, I'd expect +/- 0.1A - measuring AC, which may not be appropriate, I can't tell without taking a look at the waveform first. But thermal images don't lie. These 2 outer wires were definitely hotter and I can't explain it.

On that test I was pulling around 60W, and the tank capacitor was a large 20 uF (the largest one I tried which gave similar performance to the 4.7 uF one), the shot is probably 1-2 mn after start up.

11
I read your reply in the thread you linked and I have a question. The schematics I used to build my circuit (link: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2okKc8gWuqQ/UNpmJYrPJbI/AAAAAAAAACs/pXKNUsBjP-s/s1600/mazzilli_zvs-1.png ) is only different than the one discussed in that thread in how the primary connection is done with the rest of the circuit. I'm pretty sure your suggestion of using a separate supply for the gates would work.

Would adding a 7212 regulator to feed the gates, and adding a switch before the inductance be sufficient? The way I was doing it was by having the PSU on and hot plugging the + banana plug. But I think the reasons why it still wasn't always sufficient (especially on my second attempt) was that it was probably arc'ing/corona somewhere.

I took a look at the ignition coil that came with the ZVS today. I could never get that ignition coil to work, but I didn't need it. Anyway, there was a gap under the primary coils. Probably under 1mm.

In your previous post you mentioned ZVS drivers aren't typically used with ungapped transformers. Could this explain why it actually performed (a lot) better when I used the SSTC driver (driver input controlled by a signal generator)?

I'll wind another secondary and get some scope action tomorrow.

12
I actually started with a 3D printed housing. I made 2-3 different designs which all failed but there is quite a bit more to experiment. One of the design was pretty satisfying in regards to the cross over, basically a groove coming from the top of the previous chamber, down to the bottom of the next one. This gives the advantage of spacing out that cross over wire from other wires.

The main reason for these failures is that I wasn't using oil, the number of turns was significantly lower than what I achieved with the turned housing and thought I would get around with it. Failures were due to arc'ing to the ferrite core:
- first try was with a 2-piece housing and it went through at the silicone filled seam
- the next one was a 1-piece housing with in-fill it went through the material
- the final failed in the exact same way despite 100% infill

I am pretty sure that 3D printing is the way to go, when I get my hands on a SLA printer, I will design an open cell unit for oil filling (and with vacuum degassing), with the groove mentioned above.

Last night I designed another turned PTFE unit, much larger as I found some UY30 ferrite. It won't be as compact, but generally speaking I think there are no substitute for size when it comes to this. The bigger the transformer can be, the easier it is to prevent arc'ing.

13
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 17, 2021, 05:56:05 AM »
Thanks Dave, I split the thread here and replied there as well: https://highvoltageforum.net/index.php?topic=1391.msg10494#msg10494

14
Hi,

I am creating a new thread before splitting off too deep from the original thread (link: https://highvoltageforum.net/index.php?topic=1374.msg10493#new )

I'll re-post my last message (and David's reply) as it gave a fairly detailed description:

Quote

The transformer is fully custom, I'll post pictures later tonight. It's made of 2x "C" shape ferrite bolted together. The secondary is roughly 26mm ID x 50 mm long (that includes 15 separations that are about 2mm thick). The core has an OD of 20mm, meaning 3mm of insulating PTFE. The segmented secondary was turned on a piece of PTFE. The core is not gapped.

For the primary I have 2x 2.5 turns, which is a bit on the small side which could explain the lack of success with the ZVS driver.

After running the transformer on the SSTC driver, I decided to make my own ZVS driver. And since I ended up using roughly the same components, results were the same outside of the capacitor that was film but with high ESR, it ended up heating a lot so I replaced it with a better quality capacitor with significantly lower ESR but also slightly higher capacitance. Results were immediately better, and after playing with the few caps I had available, found that 4.7 uF was giving me the best results. Note: I did go back to the commercial ZVS and put the same 4.7uF cap across the far ends taps of the primary and results were much better, but as good as mine oddly - perhaps due to the other caps still being there. I say "caps" because that driver used 2 for some reason. The ZVS circuit I am familiar with use 1 cap across the far ends of the primary, and this one uses two. I looked at the PCB and it looks like they use 2x ~0.330F but I am not sure how it is all wired together.

I proceeded with assembly of my 200mm plasma ball, flushed it with argon at 1atm and results were great. Voltage was probably a bit high because I can't run a vacuum on that cheap plastic globe (that has a flat bottom - I tried by the way, and it's not a good idea, haha). I used a grounded striker to test contact and it would definitely shock you as opposed to normal plasma ball.

The goal is to make a bigger one (glass, round, under vacuum) so I don't think I will dial down on the voltage yet, just to make sure I have enough for the larger one down the road.


I did experience a set back with a failure of the secondary. The last chamber, last few turns (hard to tell exactly) arc'ed through the PTFE to the ferrite. Not through the thickness which was 3mm but through the last separation which was only 2mm in my design for some reason.

I've made revisions to the design and will turn it this week, increased the thicknesses separating the windings from the ferrite to a total of 4mm. I had to reduce the thickness of chamber to chamber separation to compensate, but I think this will be fine, as I don't expect any arc to get through 1mm PTFE on two adjacent chamber. If it took 16 chambers to go through 2mm or so on the HV side where the potential difference is maximum, I think I should be fine with 1mm between 2 adjacent chamber.

Another setback today after rewinding a spare V1 core. I wound this one with only 2 differences: I didn't fill the last chamber (HV side), and I tried to compensate by adding 1mm more thickness on all of the other chambers. That one failed with an arc within one chamber, along the surface of the PTFE which darkened, but no penetration. I think what happened is that my layering wasn't great on this way, I kinda rushed it last night, the added layers didn't help as it increased the voltage difference within one chamber.


With all tests I found that I was lacking a direct voltage measurement on the HV side. I actually was able to use a HV probe on my early tests (that didn't work well) and measured 8kV. After tweaking the capacitor on my own ZVS I was able to get intense plasma at ambient air and discharges over 2" long, so there is no doubt that my 10kV probe wouldn't be able to work there.

And here's David's reply:

Quote
It would be interesting to see waveforms for this - primary voltage and secondary with just antenna pickup (reasonable phase, just no amplitude calibration).  ZVS drivers usually aren't used with ungapped inductors.  Inductance is high and saturation current low.  I wonder if your system is running at a frequency determined by leakage inductance and the primary and secondary (intrawinding) capacitance.

Besides the HV end failure, the common tricky problem with segmented bobbins is the wire transition from the top of one segment to the bottom of the next.  Unless there are slots or other accommodations in the separation walls, that wire to the bottom ends up adjacent every layer (including the top) of the new segment as it is wound.  That leaves a full segment's voltage across two thicknesses of enamel insulation.

BTW, the two 0.33uF (1200Vdc, 630Vac) caps in the commercial ZVS are almost certainly in parallel.  They are standard Chinese induction cooktop capacitors, the ones I use for my DRSSTC MMC.  Some ZVS units have 6 or 8 in parallel.

And my response:

- The driver I am using is this one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07BNZ5HC1/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

- The first HV failure was definitely a hole through the PTFE, extremely small. The second HV failure (today's failure) was exactly as you described. The wire coming from the previous chamber arc'ed with another one from the new chamber. This is a typical difficult to address mechanically. I initially tried to add a tiny hole at an angle through the separation, which was just too difficult to do without at least a 4th axis. Then I thought about just using a groove. I figured that oil fill up that groove, while this could work I think I haven't been able to machine this, it is entirely possible I just need time to actually setup in the CNC machine one of my spares, or even start with one of the damaged ones.

- I haven't hooked up the oscilloscope for relevant tracing yet, but I will do that on my next try. On one early try with the HV passive probe I measured 8kV and about 50kHz.



A few more things:


As you know me by now, I am not familiar with the technical jargon and I tend to describe things at length when in fact there is usually a simple technical term for it. I'm sorry about that; so you'll judge by my pictures but I'm pretty sure my ferrite core isn't gapped, just two "C's" forming a "O" with a centered-tap primary on one cylinder and a 3000 turns or so secondary. Secondary inductance was measured to several dozen henry, and its DC resistance to ~ 370 ohm.

I have very little footage with that first secondary design, I should have recorded more, it actually worked for a few hours before failing, it actually only failed because I hooked up a larger PSU (I was using a 60V capable PSU but limited to ~3A, so voltage input was around 13V @ 3.2A) and it failed around 17V and 10A or so. So here's the only video I have, sadly with all lights on. It doesn't show it "starting up", which at times can be tricky (I need to use a switch and perhaps use a large bulk cap). It worked pretty well overall and without the need for a sharp breakout point. Also the video was taken as I was experimenting with the Amazon ZVS with the 4.7uF which I found to be optimal with my home made ZVS. So the video shows a little bit less performance than I had with the home made ZVS.

/>
Specs:
- roughly 3000 turns of 34AWG enamel wire
- U shape cores I used: link
- a (unnecessarily) large oil container (I only had 1ft tubing and nothing to make a cut straight enough for a good seal)
- all parts for the container and globe base/globe seal were CNC'ed
- the globe itself is a plastic flat neck (not sure really the material) and sadly a flat bottom (not vacuum/pressure happy) - from amazon. Took this one for its flat neck, which would allow me to design/make a simple seal. The goal is use a 350mm glass globe eventually, that will of course not fail under vacuum.
- the globe base a bunch of fittings for gas fill up and vacuum (I can bring the pressure down by 0.1-0.15 bar safely but that's enough to see a significant improvement on the arcs/plasma).
- 1.5" Brass ball


What's next:

- Short term: rewind yet another secondary, this time I'll add one layer of kapton tape to stick each new wire coming in a new chamber against that separation and keep it there, all the way down. I'll wind a bit slower too, to ensure I layer those turns as evenly as possible. I'll also try to not wind all the way to the top like I did on my first attempt which was overall much better considering it failed at much higher voltage and with a failure mode that can be completely avoided by skipping that last chamber (like I did on the second attempt).
- I am making an improved PTFE core, with thicker ends, and thicker body around the ferrite.
- I am redesigning everything else as well, larger diameter container but also much shorter. I'll also get the HV ground to come down from the bottom of the container rather than the top. I am designing this around a much bigger 20L boiling flask (that was the initial idea), and will be using vacuum valves (2 of them) for fill up and vacuum. I am also going to be using a large test tube (25mm diameter, only those are long enough to reach the center of the flask) as HV electrode support. All of those 3 tubes will go through the rubber cap of the boiling flask.
- I'll probably stick with my home made ZVS driver, unless I can figure out a way to use my SSTC driver (Full bridge, TO247 IGBT's). But that would only possible if I can get anywhere close to soft switching. And if I do stick with the ZVS driver, I need to research more what David mentioned about ZVS driver working better with gapped transformer which is not my case.
- I'd also like to add some kind of interrupter to the system (which would be trivial if I used the SSTC driver).

Pictures:

- Secondary Rev1.0 before failure
- Secondary Rev1.0 after failure: the black area has a pinhole pierced by the arc that went from the HV'most enamel wire through the PTFE to the ferrite
- Secondary Rev1.1: freshly wound secondary, this time with the last chamber skipped. Notice how, out of greed I added more turns to compensate for one less chamber? haha
- Driver pictures: I CNC'ed single sided Clad (4 or 5 oz I think). I used SOT227 Mosfets mainly for practical reasons; also thought I'd easier to kill them, especially considering I'm using current limited PSU's. I need to upgrade the 470 ohm resistor to higher wattage.

15
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 17, 2021, 01:48:10 AM »
The transformer is fully custom, I'll post pictures later tonight. It's made of 2x "C" shape ferrite bolted together. The secondary is roughly 26mm ID x 50 mm long (that includes 15 separations that are about 2mm thick). The core has an OD of 20mm, meaning 3mm of insulating PTFE. The segmented secondary was turned on a piece of PTFE. The core is not gapped.

For the primary I have 2x 2.5 turns, which is a bit on the small side which could explain the lack of success with the ZVS driver.

After running the transformer on the SSTC driver, I decided to make my own ZVS driver. And since I ended up using roughly the same components, results were the same outside of the capacitor that was film but with high ESR, it ended up heating a lot so I replaced it with a better quality capacitor with significantly lower ESR but also slightly higher capacitance. Results were immediately better, and after playing with the few caps I had available, found that 4.7 uF was giving me the best results. Note: I did go back to the commercial ZVS and put the same 4.7uF cap across the far ends taps of the primary and results were much better, but as good as mine oddly - perhaps due to the other caps still being there. I say "caps" because that driver used 2 for some reason. The ZVS circuit I am familiar with use 1 cap across the far ends of the primary, and this one uses two. I looked at the PCB and it looks like they use 2x ~0.330F but I am not sure how it is all wired together.

I proceeded with assembly of my 200mm plasma ball, flushed it with argon at 1atm and results were great. Voltage was probably a bit high because I can't run a vacuum on that cheap plastic globe (that has a flat bottom - I tried by the way, and it's not a good idea, haha). I used a grounded striker to test contact and it would definitely shock you as opposed to normal plasma ball.

The goal is to make a bigger one (glass, round, under vacuum) so I don't think I will dial down on the voltage yet, just to make sure I have enough for the larger one down the road.


I did experience a set back with a failure of the secondary. The last chamber, last few turns (hard to tell exactly) arc'ed through the PTFE to the ferrite. Not through the thickness which was 3mm but through the last separation which was only 2mm in my design for some reason.

I've made revisions to the design and will turn it this week, increased the thicknesses separating the windings from the ferrite to a total of 4mm. I had to reduce the thickness of chamber to chamber separation to compensate, but I think this will be fine, as I don't expect any arc to get through 1mm PTFE on two adjacent chamber. If it took 16 chambers to go through 2mm or so on the HV side where the potential difference is maximum, I think I should be fine with 1mm between 2 adjacent chamber.

Another setback today after rewinding a spare V1 core. I wound this one with only 2 differences: I didn't fill the last chamber (HV side), and I tried to compensate by adding 1mm more thickness on all of the other chambers. That one failed with an arc within one chamber, along the surface of the PTFE which darkened, but no penetration. I think what happened is that my layering wasn't great on this way, I kinda rushed it last night, the added layers didn't help as it increased the voltage difference within one chamber.


With all tests I found that I was lacking a direct voltage measurement on the HV side. I actually was able to use a HV probe on my early tests (that didn't work well) and measured 8kV. After tweaking the capacitor on my own ZVS I was able to get intense plasma at ambient air and discharges over 2" long, so there is no doubt that my 10kV probe wouldn't be able to work there.

I think I'll copy this in a new thread in the appropriate section because it's pretty interesting too, and some my findings could be of use to someone else.

16
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 14, 2021, 09:24:10 AM »
I'll post some stuff soon in a thread about the DR that I am putting together reusing this full bridge initially.

Meanwhile, I wanted to do an experiment with this bridge and driver. I didn't want to create a new thread for this especially as it's directly related to the stuff built in this thread. Basically I turned a multi-chamber secondary structure out of PTFE and got around to wind it today. I initially hooked it up to one of those ZVS boards with underwhelming results. It's a possibility that my primary didn't have enough turn (I went with 2x 2.5 turns - the driver is designed for a center tap primary). Anyway, I thought I'd give a shot on my SSTC driver/bridge. So I disconnected the 7414 and feedback, and taped my signal generator to the input pin of the driver chip. Results were quite a bit better than with the ZVS driver. And since I still had the oscilloscope hooked up the same way it was for the SSTC I immediately saw the IGBT were hard switching. With very little input power my temperature probe already showed they were heating more than they do with the SSTC at much great input power. I tried adding the DC blocking cap again thinking it might move the phase a bit, and it did but nothing significant. First screenshot is without the 4.7uF and the second is with it.

Anyway I stopped there and started doing some research on the topic and found that Steve Ward actually did something very similar: https://www.stevehv.4hv.org/FBD.htm
He doesn't talk about hard/soft switching but other than for a half bridge and a couple of caps it's basically the same concept. He does mention he was able to pull 450W which is probably over 10 times what I was able to pull safely today. IGBT's may not be the best for this, but I was comfortably switching at 150 kHz which is well in the capabilities of those IGBT's. With this soft switching, this project could work. The transformer itself (well the secondary) is a success from what I can tell. I have at least over 3000 turns, everything submerged in mineral oil.

17
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 11, 2021, 08:53:39 PM »
Thanks, I'm a bit surprised but happy you were able to learn some!

Everything makes a lot more sense now; I'll continue experimenting with primary turns (coupling/inductance) I have a feeling this part of the system has room for improvement. I'll convert this into a double resonance shortly as well, I have almost everything built just to put it all together.

18
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 11, 2021, 07:44:03 PM »
I kept the same wire spacing, so coupling definitely went down as well.

19
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 11, 2021, 07:28:49 PM »
yes, that makes sense - for some reason (probably screenshots I've seen from build threads, blogs, etc) I was expecting a sine wave as normal current waveform.

Quite a few things have changed since #82. Not sure if they will explain this though:
- adjusted primary turns (same diameter and wire spacing) turns went from 16 to 11.
- 20 ohm + 1uF were added in parallel of the GDT DC blocking cap
- the resistance across pins 1 and 2 of the inverter was 10k, and was adjusted back to 20k

20
Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC) / Re: First SSTC build - some questions
« on: January 11, 2021, 06:33:01 AM »
Thanks for the corrections on the current calculations. I used the formula both Kaizer and Loneoceans shared on their SSTC pages but didn't realize they didn't have a full bridge as example. That makes sense though, I kinda figured that out by thinking about how the full positive bus generates the positive current waveform, i.e. ~340V for 0-Max current, and vice verse for the other half.

That final plot was in the part of the waveform where the amplitude is pretty much constant (i.e. a bit past the blob). That was more of a capture to get a measurement of the period to better approximate the reactance off the measured Fres rather than an estimation from JavaTC. I did gather a lot more data and didn't want to abuse of the great help and attention you've been giving  this thread; I also noticed how that one plot shows some deviation from the usually much cleaner sinewaves. This, (and the phase shift) happens relatively brutally around 180-200VDC on the bus, i.e. pretty clean before that. That also somewhat coincides with the phase shift, where under 180VDC current would switch close to 0 current, and it gets increasingly de-phased at higher voltages. A video would have probably been better to get more of a dynamic feel on how that shift and sine deformations are taking place.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

* Recent Topics and Posts

post Re: Drsstc Driver Board for Tesla Coil Driver Optic Fiber Splice
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
iw1esu
Today at 01:56:54 PM
post Cap Identification 64KV
[Capacitor Banks]
Thermionix
Today at 07:14:33 AM
post Re: ZVS driven Plasma Ball (w/ segmented PTFE Secondary)
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
Today at 05:20:21 AM
post Re: ZVS driven Plasma Ball (w/ segmented PTFE Secondary)
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
klugesmith
Today at 03:44:12 AM
post Re: ZVS driven Plasma Ball (w/ segmented PTFE Secondary)
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
Today at 03:31:35 AM
post Re: ZVS driven Plasma Ball (w/ segmented PTFE Secondary)
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
Today at 03:01:47 AM
post Re: Cold Gas Satellite Thruster
[General Chat]
klugesmith
Today at 02:53:23 AM
post Re: ZVS driven Plasma Ball (w/ segmented PTFE Secondary)
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
Today at 02:52:00 AM
post Cold Gas Satellite Thruster
[General Chat]
Patrick
Today at 02:02:40 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
Today at 01:04:03 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
Today at 12:39:10 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 19, 2021, 11:13:22 PM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General Chat]
AeraCura_
January 19, 2021, 10:45:50 PM
post Re: Welcome new members, come say hello and tell a little about yourself :)
[General Chat]
N1G3L
January 19, 2021, 09:17:18 PM
post Re: Alcatel Lucent B4 RRH2x60-4R teardown and reverse engineering
[Radio Frequency]
Da_Stier
January 19, 2021, 06:20:10 PM
post Fusor power supply
[Voltage Multipliers]
hammertone
January 19, 2021, 05:27:02 PM
post Re: Just a noob with some HV concerns...
[Beginners]
MrScrOggs
January 19, 2021, 01:21:13 PM
post Re: Just a noob with some HV concerns...
[Beginners]
klugesmith
January 19, 2021, 07:04:16 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 19, 2021, 06:37:53 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 19, 2021, 06:16:41 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 19, 2021, 05:00:50 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 19, 2021, 04:03:12 AM
post Just a noob with some HV concerns...
[Beginners]
MrScrOggs
January 19, 2021, 03:07:11 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 19, 2021, 02:57:27 AM
post Re: compact midi interrupter
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
TMaxElectronics
January 19, 2021, 12:06:44 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 18, 2021, 11:56:31 PM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
Alberto
January 18, 2021, 11:50:22 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
klugesmith
January 18, 2021, 10:30:15 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 18, 2021, 10:03:46 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 18, 2021, 09:58:44 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 18, 2021, 08:52:29 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 18, 2021, 07:08:09 PM
post Re: Adding interrupter Self oscillating tesla coil
[Beginners]
davekni
January 18, 2021, 06:49:28 PM
post Re: Alcatel Lucent B4 RRH2x60-4R teardown and reverse engineering
[Radio Frequency]
Da_Stier
January 18, 2021, 06:12:44 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Large Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
klugesmith
January 18, 2021, 04:53:23 PM
post Adding interrupter Self oscillating tesla coil
[Beginners]
arto
January 18, 2021, 11:54:54 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 18, 2021, 08:27:18 AM
post Re: Self Oscillating Half Bridge Wonder
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Acid Byte
January 18, 2021, 06:57:06 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 18, 2021, 06:43:19 AM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 18, 2021, 05:48:27 AM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
klugesmith
January 18, 2021, 01:03:48 AM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
Alberto
January 18, 2021, 12:26:26 AM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 17, 2021, 11:29:04 PM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
Alberto
January 17, 2021, 09:55:24 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
zytra
January 17, 2021, 09:34:21 PM
post Re: Segmented PTFE Secondary, Plasma Ball project
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 17, 2021, 08:51:50 PM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
davekni
January 17, 2021, 08:04:54 PM
post Re: compact midi interrupter
[Computers, Microcontrollers, Programmable Logic, Interfaces and Displays]
tophat
January 17, 2021, 05:40:59 PM
post Re: Schlieren images projected onto a wall (no camera)
[Light, Lasers and Optics]
Uspring
January 17, 2021, 05:12:45 PM
post Re: how to run these guys?
[Transformer (Ferrite Core)]
SteveN87
January 17, 2021, 02:20:09 PM

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal