Author Topic: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector  (Read 1981 times)

Offline klugesmith

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« on: March 15, 2020, 09:50:48 PM »
Just noticed the thread about big old Soviet smoke detector, which makes this one seem as safe as baby ducklings.  Told this story yesterday, in almost the same words, on another forum.

Here is an old stock Pyrotronics F5B smoke detector head, similar to the F3/5 head. They are still available for people maintaining old installations, but typically cost well over $100 on ebay.

Ionization-type smoke detectors seem to have started in the 1960's. Preventing fires in industrial & institutional settings easily justified the proliferation of 80 microcurie Am-241 alpha particle sources. Those produce enough air ionization that a cold cathode trigger tube can switch the alarm circuit.

I got the pictured device to turn on a neon lamp, within a few seconds of being exposed to smoke from a smoldering popsicle stick. My circuit is shown below, on the right. The original application uses Base Units (sockets) with resistors and a neon indicator lamp, and if any reader has one I'd love to know the circuit details.

.
These old smoke detectors, just like modern ones with less than 1 uCi of radioisotope, use a reference ionization chamber as the high impedance on top of voltage divider. Cheaper than a many-gigaohm resistor, and it automatically compensates for pressure and temperature and decay of the alpha particle source.

I found out that the internal construction is similar to this unfinished drawing.  The ion chambers in schematic above were rendered accordingly.


It came as a surprise that the larger ionization source, which irradiates the smoky chamber, is directly visible through the window-screened ports. Close enough that energetic alpha particles, not just ions, could be escaping from the enclosure. Let's check with some alpha-viewing fluorescent film, like what's sold for making spinthariscopes.


Set shutter time to 30 s, aperture f/1.4, ISO 12800. Lights off, not completely. Go...


This device could be disassembled without any screwdriving, wrenching, or cutting. 
Not sure if that's a good idea, or a thing to talk about.
Even if it were reassembled and tested as a working smoke detector, good as new, ready to protect lives.

Offline John123

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 227
  • Karma: +4/-0
  • All the gear, no idea. UK
    • View Profile
Re: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2020, 05:57:16 AM »
Looks quite big in the photo compared to the ones inside modern detectors.

How come they were designed as replaceable parts, do they wear out and become unreliable over time?

Offline johnf

  • High Voltage Technician
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2020, 07:34:09 PM »
I think the part has been made much like tubes were made
in fact that looks like a standard octal tube base with a few pins missing.
this would fit well with early electronics manufacture allowing all to be tested before the detector head was put in

Offline TheMaxii2007

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2020, 04:19:02 AM »
Hello My old smoke detector Am-241 (72 microcurie )  ;)






« Last Edit: June 02, 2020, 04:32:01 AM by TheMaxii2007 »

Offline klugesmith

  • High Voltage Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
  • Karma: +11/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« Reply #4 on: June 04, 2020, 06:30:09 AM »
Welcome to the forum, and thank you for the interesting report.

The sectional drawing you shared is much better than anything I've seen before.
It sure beats measuring parts and drawing things from scratch.
Does the document it came from include details of the circuit in base unit?

Is there a model number and/or date code on your device? 
How come the nominal activity is 72 uCi, vs 80 uCi in my specimens and in the F3/5 model we can read about?

Might as well share a picture I made with alpha-viewing film, to get an idea of relative activity in the outer and inner chamber irradiators, next to a modern sub-1-uCi source.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2020, 06:49:45 AM by klugesmith »

Offline TheMaxii2007

  • High Voltage Enthusiast
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

High Voltage Forum

Re: Reverse engineering a big old American smoke detector
« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2020, 10:44:15 PM »

 


* Recent Topics and Posts

post Exploding phones and electronics, a mini-series of 50kA discharges!
[Capacitor Banks]
Mads Barnkob
Today at 08:27:10 PM
post Re: LCR meter recommendation
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Mads Barnkob
Today at 08:23:57 PM
post Re: LCR meter recommendation
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Max
Today at 02:51:45 PM
post Re: LCR meter recommendation
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
Da_Stier
Today at 02:01:23 PM
post LCR meter recommendation
[Sell / Buy / Trade]
the_anomaly
Today at 01:58:48 PM
post Re: The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
Mads Barnkob
Today at 12:42:03 PM
post Re: The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
haversin
Today at 02:49:00 AM
post Re: The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
Mads Barnkob
June 16, 2021, 08:54:32 PM
post Re: The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
davekni
June 16, 2021, 08:00:50 PM
post Re: The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
haversin
June 16, 2021, 05:40:40 PM
post Demo Coil Protection
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
alan sailer
June 16, 2021, 05:39:14 PM
post Re: What is the guidence on SpaceX rockets based on ? PID's?
[General Chat]
Twospoons
June 16, 2021, 10:20:30 AM
post Re: What is the guidence on SpaceX rockets based on ? PID's?
[General Chat]
Patrick
June 16, 2021, 07:33:15 AM
post Re: Through-hole layout of UD2.7C universal driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
dbach
June 15, 2021, 01:21:38 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 15, 2021, 12:02:58 PM
post Re: Through-hole layout of UD2.7C universal driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 15, 2021, 06:52:56 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
thedoc298
June 15, 2021, 05:43:07 AM
post Re: Through-hole layout of UD2.7C universal driver
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
dbach
June 15, 2021, 05:26:34 AM
post The dramatic difference between wet and dry sphere splashes
[Science, Research and News In Other Fields Than Electronics]
haversin
June 15, 2021, 02:27:03 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 14, 2021, 01:06:02 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 14, 2021, 12:44:31 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 14, 2021, 12:41:33 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 14, 2021, 12:11:13 AM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 13, 2021, 11:52:11 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 13, 2021, 11:38:44 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 13, 2021, 10:26:51 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 13, 2021, 09:57:56 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 13, 2021, 09:29:08 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 13, 2021, 08:53:25 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 13, 2021, 07:22:05 PM
post Re: First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
davekni
June 13, 2021, 07:02:28 PM
post Re: HFSSTC with fixed crystal-controlled frequency
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Steve Ward
June 13, 2021, 06:25:20 PM
post First middle sized DRSSTC - Phase lead tuning
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Rapy2
June 13, 2021, 02:48:59 PM
post OpenTheremin v3 loosing calibration after minutes
[Electronic Circuits]
gianpaolo
June 13, 2021, 12:00:09 PM
post Re: What is the guidence on SpaceX rockets based on ? PID's?
[General Chat]
Mads Barnkob
June 12, 2021, 07:28:03 PM
post Re: Rocket engine questions
[General Chat]
klugesmith
June 12, 2021, 07:23:12 PM
post Re: Rocket engine questions
[General Chat]
rikkitikkitavi
June 12, 2021, 12:24:06 PM
post Re: Nice PC Board Tesla
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Da_Stier
June 12, 2021, 10:06:18 AM
post Re: Rocket engine questions
[General Chat]
plasma
June 12, 2021, 10:01:29 AM
post Re: Nice PC Board Tesla
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Twospoons
June 12, 2021, 08:47:08 AM
post Re: What is the guidence on SpaceX rockets based on ? PID's?
[General Chat]
Patrick
June 12, 2021, 07:03:10 AM
post Re: Complications in the design of the first DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
PEDRO HENRIQUE
June 12, 2021, 06:42:56 AM
post Re: Nice PC Board Tesla
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
davekni
June 12, 2021, 04:20:53 AM
post Re: SKM100 Mini DRSSTC
[Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC)]
Willsmith001
June 11, 2021, 11:08:24 PM
post Re: How much propagation delay is too much propagation delay
[General Chat]
Willsmith001
June 11, 2021, 11:07:00 PM
post Re: Nice PC Board Tesla
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
Da_Stier
June 11, 2021, 12:33:55 PM
post Re: Nice PC Board Tesla
[Solid State Tesla Coils (SSTC)]
futurist
June 11, 2021, 12:03:24 PM
post Re: How much propagation delay is too much propagation delay
[General Chat]
davekni
June 11, 2021, 06:47:52 AM
post Re: How much propagation delay is too much propagation delay
[General Chat]
Power-Max
June 11, 2021, 06:32:02 AM
post Re: How much propagation delay is too much propagation delay
[General Chat]
davekni
June 11, 2021, 05:16:03 AM

Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal