High Voltage Forum

Tesla coils => Dual Resonant Solid State Tesla coils (DRSSTC) => Topic started by: oneKone on March 26, 2018, 04:13:08 AM

Title: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on March 26, 2018, 04:13:08 AM
While my second drsstc is on hold i thought I'd start trying to design another drsstc. The two coils I'm thinking of are:

110mm diameter, 440mm winding length, 0.3mm wire, 1460 turns. As for the bridge I was thinking about a full bridge of 82N120. Eric Goodchild wrote that 82N120 can run at the same frequency as the ixgn60n60. I'm thinking of using the 82n120 so I can go up to 600v bus.

Or

160 diameter, 640mm winding length, 0.3mm wire, 2130 turns.
With a fullbridge of cm300du-24.

As for the driver I'm on the fence to go with a 1.3b or an 2.7c driver, especially because I have an unpopulated 2.7c board, or if there's a point when  phase shift should be added to a coil,  at what point it's necessary. I'm hoping someone could maybe provide some insight with these more larger coils.


Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on March 26, 2018, 09:45:09 AM
Be careful with multiprojectitis, it is a horrible syndrome and we are many that suffer from it ;)

I would advise you on building the larger CM300 coil, simply because it is a different beast of a inverter than the TO- package parts you have been using so far. It can take so much more abuse just from the shear size of the silicon die.

Both 1.3 and 2.x with phase lead will work great on your coil. Phase lead is used to minimize hard switching current when we are not hitting ZCS spot on, so as long as you can manage the extra temperature rise, there is nothing wrong with a little hard switching, but if you start pushing things to the limit and beyond it suddenly gets critical! If you run your CM300 at some 600-800A there should be no problems without phase lead, but if you want to push them above 1kA, you better well use it :)

You could always do the math according to the temperature calculations in my IGBT selection guide and see how much phase shift you can allow and still stay below 30 degree Celsius temperature rise per pulse (and be able to cool that off before next pulse).
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on March 26, 2018, 12:45:27 PM
Mads...... You simply never fail to give good advice! I'll go with the cm300 config, as well as reading your guide. I figured since I have the spare time I might as well wind a coil. But I think to add my own flair I'll water cool the system, especially with aio kits being relatively cheap.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on April 16, 2018, 05:23:22 AM
Ok....  After a bit of thinking I'm going to go with the 110mm diameter by 440mm long secondary. I think I'll be too space limited to do full power runs with a bigger coil. But the plan of cm300du fullbridge is still going to happen!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on April 17, 2018, 03:06:07 PM
If you get too many ground strikes with a short secondary coil, you can always place the coil up on a table :)

It is only a problem if you end up with a coil that only makes topload to strike ring sparks, but with a good long break out point that is properly not an issue.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on April 17, 2018, 03:31:42 PM
literally the only thing i focused on " short secondary coil " (man my mind operates differently after gaming).

A large portion of my decision to change the secondary length was because i don't have enough wire, but i'm going to have to order more anyways to build a new pll sstc. So the big build is back on! realistically it's only about $130 price difference. Another thing that i'm thinking of changing is rather than going for cm300du-24 bricks i might go for the cm300du-12. part of me wants to try the Chinese bricks to see how far i can get, even though the sting of those ixgn60n60 still feels fresh! 

I think this build will take a while. with bigger ticket items it's going to put put more of a strain on my project/hobby budget.     
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 08, 2018, 02:37:46 PM
First proper update on the build!

I've ordered 3 used cm300dy-24 bricks (thank you Mads for the link) and i wound the secondary. In the past i've been winding secondaries by hand and this has proven to be very time consuming. This time it was different! i held the form between centres and used a rotary buffer connected to a variac for speed adjustment. the coil took about an hour and a half to wind.

I've applied 5 coats of polyurethane and will apply about 5-8 coats (with sanding) of oil based polyurethane to get a nice finish and shine.

the coil sitting next to the mini drsstc:   
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 15, 2018, 10:13:50 AM
another small update!

I've received the cm300 bricks.... man they're big! I'm also just going to get a spun aluminium toroid, its kinda expensive but they look incredible. hopefully this weekend i'll get the driver assembled and tested.   

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 16, 2018, 10:16:17 AM
Beautiful secondary coil, how tall will the complete system be? Around some 1.5 meter?

Big is good! Almost impossible to destroy with that amount of silicon on a huge copper heat sink.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 16, 2018, 03:48:06 PM
Cheers,

My guess a the moment is about 1.2m. I'm still unsure if I'm going to go with air or liquid cooling. With air I could find some heatsinks on eBay or get some vapour chamber type CPU coolers, with water I was just going to go with 2 x140mm aio.

I'm unsure if I should buy the toroid first or buy the bus and tank capacitors and other parts to build the base.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 17, 2018, 10:49:04 AM
Water cooling is only necessary if you are going to push it very hard, long on-times, high bps and for long run times. Forced air cooling on a large heat sink will be good for most cases. If anything needs water cooling its usually the primary coil before the IGBTs, due to self induction heating of the inner turns.

Get the bus and tank capacitors first, there you have much more work to do and surprises to get, parts missing etc. A toroid is pretty much plug and play on top :)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 18, 2018, 02:21:17 PM
Cheers for the guidance. It's insane how much more expensive a larger coil is to build vs a small one. I'm guessing as long as the bus caps have a rms current rating of at least 15A they'll be ok?

As for the heatsink I think I'm just going to turn to eBay. There's nothing local that I know of, I'm thinking of this one:
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 18, 2018, 02:56:13 PM
You can calculate the needed RMS rating from the math supplied here: http://kaizerpowerelectronics.dk/tesla-coils/drsstc-design-guide/dc-bus-capacitor/

That is pretty expensive for a new and relatively small heat sink, is there no industry / scrap yard near you where you can find a scrapped variable frequency drive and scavenge the heat sink from that?

How about local HAM / radio amateurs, they usually have a good stock of heat sinks too :)

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 19, 2018, 01:23:32 AM
Cheers for the link, I'll have a look and hopefully order the bus caps Tonight.

Unfortunately in Perth there's not a lot around. Back in my earlier days of electronics the scrap yard would have random parts like that, these days there's almost nothing. I'll have a look at AliExpress.

This is the only suitable heatsink I have for them. They have a bit of overhang but main portion of the die is making contact.
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]  
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 22, 2018, 10:29:22 PM
If the IGBT module can not fit on the surface it is not hard to deem that it is too small a heat sink :)

Large enough heat sinks are however pretty expensive from new, but it did spark me to start up on a heat sink and cooling chapter for the DRSSTC design guide, as I did have some notes here and there on selecting a heat sink and some measurements from Hydron.

If it wasn't so darn expensive to ship 5 kg half around the globe, I would have sent you a heat sink from my stack :(
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 24, 2018, 12:00:05 PM
haha i knew i was dreaming about the heatsink! one thing i've thought of is just getting another and having them side by side with a module one each heatsink. Honestly cheers for the thought of the heatsink, i'll have a few months to think about my options...... which brings me to this,

I'm going to have to put the build on hold. i ended up cracking two teeth in my sleep, one half of one tooth was missing and the other is cracked! so now instead of buying the parts for a coil i'm going to have to save money for crowns.... such is life
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 28, 2018, 04:52:49 AM
@Mads,
Assuming you could be bothered dealing with shipping a heatsink. I don't suppose you'd have a ballpark figure of what you'd want for the heatsink plus shipping?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 29, 2018, 07:13:27 AM
5 kg is something stupid like 75€ to ship to Australia, you could properly get a brand new from RS with that money. Maybe try to find a local aussie with some spare heatsinks on eevblog.com forum?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on June 16, 2018, 09:45:09 AM
you were correct mads, A heatsink from rs components isn't badly priced.

 I think for the mmc i'm going to use 940C20P47K-F with 3 in series and 3 in parallel, for the heatsink i'm going to go with this: https://au.rs-online.com/web/p/heatsinks/1898404/ . its a bit off putting being only 30mm fin depth but with 2 x 140mm pwm pc fans i think it will stay under control. as for the bus capacitors i think i'll be going for 2 x 4700uf 450vdc in a voltage doubler configuration.

The other day i scored 2 x cm150du-24f  bricks for $30 delivered. Initial tests show them to be working perfectly, so i think for a smaller coil for my next build these will be a goto.

edit:
i was looking at these capacitors and was wondering if anyone has seen them in a drsstc before?
https://au.rs-online.com/web/p/polypropylene-film-capacitors/1235134/
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on June 18, 2018, 11:13:39 AM
Without doing the numbers, that MMC sounds way too small for a CM300 coil. The snubber capacitors are good pulse rated MKP capacitors and others have used them in a MMC before. Works just fine!

The heat sink will do good, noise from high air flow is not really a concern in a Tesla coil, so just give that plate plenty of air flow and the fin length will not matter, the superior cooling comes from high air flow and many fins!

DC bus capacitors sound fine, add some MKP snubbers aswell, across the IGBTs.

Neat with some smaller bricks, looking forward to drsstc4 ;)

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Hydron on June 18, 2018, 12:31:42 PM
I agree with Mads about your MMC - 3 in series is only 6kV, which could significantly limit the peak current for a coil of this size, especially if you find that you need to reduce the number in parallel to 2 to get a lower total capacitance (0.47uF seems on the high side compared with other 160mm coils). If you already have the caps then make sure you the MMC construction allows for you to configure them in 4s2p for an 8kV/0.235uF option as well. To do it properly I'd suggest getting a few more to allow for a few more configurations up to 6s/3p (as per snubber suggestion below).

As for the snubber question, for both MMC and DC bus snubber use I have used the similar Aerovox snubber caps in a DRSSTC of a similar size (CM300s, 160mm*730mm secondary).

Mine were 2uF/1000V though, so the MMC ended up with a couple of fairly long strings to get a sensible capacitance/voltage rating. This was OK though, as I had over 50 of them available - my MMC allowed for up to 24 in series in each of 2 strings (with capacitance selected by choosing where to attach a shorting jumper on each string). This MMC works very well, and didn't seem to get warm even after a continuous 10-min run at ~1.5kW heating up a dummy load (cast iron skillet with bacon and eggs).

If you were to use the snubbers for a MMC I'd say that you'd need at least 5 in series and 2-3 strings in parallel, e.g. 6s3p for 18 caps total. Have a play with Mads' MMC calculator on his website and your expected coil parameters.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 03, 2018, 12:10:13 PM
cheers hydron, i'll take your advice about the mcc. Originally i think i was trying to be too conservative about how much money to spend on it.

In other news i've found these capacitors:
 https://www.ebay.com.au/i/401383408371?chn=ps

If i'm reading that correctly that's a bargain! especially with the high ripple current described in the data sheet.

I'll hopefully be returning to this project very soon. i think i'll order the capacitors (bus) and the heatsink this friday, then the mmc capacitors in another week or so.

Edit:
The only downside I see with the capacitors I linked is the diameter. I can mount the capacitors on-top of the igbts to get the lowest possible inductance but it's more than I would like, in saying that I've seen voltage multipliers on drsstc inverters that also look high inductance that use bigger snubbers...
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on July 04, 2018, 10:16:42 AM
It is a fair price for a brand new capacitor of that size, 2nd hand with long time on shelf or so would properly be around 25-50% of that price, if you found it on ebay.

You can actually quite precise judge a electrolytic capacitor on its physical dimensions if its made for high ripple current. The large terminals is a dead give away, but also a large diameter and short length is a clear indicator of that. Long capacitors are not good for large ripple currents as they would heat up much more near the terminals than at the bottom.

Just use some good big copper bus bars to mount them on the side of the IGBTs with a 90 degree bend or something like that. Remember that electrolytic capacitors should not be mounted upside down due to the vent hole, and you mount it on the side, see if you can possible have the vent plug/hole as much upwards as possible.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Hydron on July 04, 2018, 12:00:30 PM
I agree that it looks like a fair price for a new one. I assume you're planning on using a couple in series for voltage doubled 240V mains? This would give a similar capacitance to what I'm using on my similar sized coil, which seems to work ok (though is probably on the low side of acceptable).

As for mounting, I'd check the manufacturer recommendations - my RIFA (Kemet) caps are ok in any orientation but the manufacturer warns that if they vent then the mess will be worse if they are not facing upwards. Was not an option for me so mine are mounted downwards, and I'll just have to deal with it if they vent.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 05, 2018, 01:28:31 AM
Cheers guys,

I am planning to mount them vertically. I was originally going to try aluminium for my bus bars but I think I'll start looking for copper plate. 

@Hydron. You're correct. Originally I was just going to run rectified mains but I thought while I'm building it I might as well go with a voltage doubler config.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Usernametaken on July 12, 2018, 10:14:41 AM
If you find copper please let me know :)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 14, 2018, 04:00:09 AM
@Usernametaken,

i've found a couple of sellers on ebay that sell copper sheet/plate. if you search for lets say "5mm t2 copper sheet" you'll get a few hits. I'll more than likely order from ebay, just waiting on getting the capacitors first. 
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 21, 2018, 10:44:21 AM
The capacitors have come! For me it honestly makes a difference to hold the item and see how it's going to sit in relation to the igbts. At the moment I'm thinking about getting 5mm thick 30mm wide copper plate, I'm just trying to figure out a way that will have the least wasted material.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: futurist on July 21, 2018, 05:51:07 PM
I use the same capacitors for my DRSSTC. They seem pretty robust, only downside is that they don't come with screw stud so you need to make some sort of a mount
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on July 22, 2018, 08:31:11 PM
5mm copper sheet is way overkill for the required current/low inductance, but as the capacitor does not have a mounting stud, you could construct the bridge bus bar in such a way that its the mechanical structure that holds all the weight of the capacitors.

Nice little stubby electrolytics by the way, for sure made for high ripple current! ...or low clearance designs :)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 23, 2018, 01:38:59 PM
@ futurist, at least someone is using these!

@mads, my thinking exactly! i'm hoping the 5mm plate will stop them from moving around, if not i'll machine up some acetal standoffs.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Nijin on August 03, 2018, 10:59:08 AM
@oneKone I used 5mm aluminium busbar for my inverter, they don't overheat with 1500A and they are much more easier to cut than copper ;)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 07, 2018, 12:58:50 AM
Cheers for the suggestion @Nijin. I thought for weeks about using aluminium for the bus bars. The only downside is that I would have had to buy 8 meters of it... In the end I bought some copper flat bar, just waiting on it getting delivered now!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on September 05, 2018, 05:44:25 AM
*I ended up removing my previous comment as it didn't make much sense*

Ok so it's time to get back into this project! I'm going to order the MCC and snubber capacitors tomorrow night (finally). I'm going to try 3 parallel X 3 series to give 0.33uf @ 9kv.

For the toroid I've found this:
http://4hv.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?177424.0
The concept seems easy enough to pull off, so I'm going to buy a small length of copper tube and pipe and see if I can make a few sections.

Hopefully this weekend is productive!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on September 05, 2018, 10:08:06 AM
0.33 uF at 9 kV is a good compromise for a coil your size.

Regarding the ringed toroid, Uspring lately made a comment about having trouble when using too think tubing, so have this in mind :) https://highvoltageforum.net/index.php?topic=457.msg2801;topicseen#new
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on September 05, 2018, 12:31:49 PM
0.33 uF at 9 kV is a good compromise for a coil your size.

Regarding the ringed toroid, Uspring lately made a comment about having trouble when using too think tubing, so have this in mind :) https://highvoltageforum.net/index.php?topic=457.msg2801;topicseen#new

cheers mads,
i thought with the mmc it should be a good starting point, if i need i can always order more capacitors. Also a massive thank you for the link! in the back of my mind i knew i had seen a post on this forum, but for the life of me i could not remember. Maybe it would be worth a shot making a smaller toroid for my first drsstc and see if that gets any bad tendencies, and also how to fix them. I wonder if heavy coats of polyurethane could help?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on September 12, 2018, 12:21:48 PM
okely dokely,

after a long ass time on the shelf i have finally populated the through hole ud2.7c designed by profdc9 -if your still lurking a massive thank you for releasing the files. I've also received the snubber and mmc capacitors. As for the heatsink for the bricks i ended up going individual heatsinks as it was half the price..

I think i'll keep the current pace of this project, for me when i start going to fast in a project/hobby it starts to feel like work or a chore, so i want to keep it fun for myself. Hopefully all this mini updates don't seem too fragmented!

anyways picture time!!!!
 [ Invalid Attachment ]  
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: profdc9 on September 16, 2018, 04:34:36 AM
Nice work populating the board.   Just make sure you put heatsinks on the voltage regulators, or they will overheat.  Let us know how it goes.  You can even try the ud29 board if you want to try skip pulse.   It's almost the same board, but with only a handful of extra components.

BTW I put the DRSSTC PCB pack up on github

https://github.com/profdc9/DRSSTC-PCB-Pack

Enjoy,

Dan
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on September 17, 2018, 11:17:23 AM
Looks good, solid choices and careful component picking, it takes time to get everything at the right price :) If we had the money to blow, we would just pay someone else to build it wouldn't we?

Do not feel bad about slow progress, I spent 4 years to complete my large DRSSTC. Right now I really feel the time disappearing with a house to restore and 2 kids. Just hang inthere!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on September 19, 2018, 02:28:27 AM
Cheers for the heads up dan, I'll swing past Jaycar and get some heatsinks! As for pulse skipping I haven't really looked into it so I'll have a read on your thread.

Cheers for the encouragement mads. You've got the nail on the head! Thankfully buying the main components is over! Just remembering all the smaller components now! I can semi relate with your current circumstances, for me it's repainting and reflooring my house... And I also decided to paint one of my car's in my garage..... Something now I wish I hadn't started! Tbh I still find it amazing you find the time to be a family man, Goto work, renovate a house, run a forum and post YouTube videos...

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on February 28, 2019, 11:21:25 AM
time to get started on this project again!

in the time since i last posted i haven't achieved much. the bridge and the mmc are pretty much completed with some minor tweaks needed.

For the bridge i ended up using 8mm aluminium plate for the bus bars which has an added bonus of making the assembly more rigid, although i don't know if its a wise decision to be relying on the terminals of the bricks to take the load of the capacitors?  As for the mmc it was pretty simple. 3mm x 15mm coper flat bar was used along with m6 cap heads to keep everything in place.



Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on April 10, 2019, 01:45:25 AM
For about a month now I've been put off on this project, I really couldn't be bothered making any progress and I couldn't figure out why..... Then it hit me! I hate the look of it 😢

Basically I had a 450x450x350mm "cube" for the base of the coil, to me that's pretty unappealing. One look I do like are round bases both a helical primary. Apart from Mads drsstc 1 I haven't really seen bigger drsstc with helical primaries at all, unless having a pancake primary was more of the norm 5-10 years ago?

So my question is, are there any drawbacks from having a helical primary at this size I can't think of?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on April 10, 2019, 09:13:24 AM
For about a month now I've been put off on this project, I really couldn't be bothered making any progress and I couldn't figure out why..... Then it hit me! I hate the look of it 😢

Basically I had a 450x450x350mm "cube" for the base of the coil, to me that's pretty unappealing. One look I do like are round bases both a helical primary. Apart from Mads drsstc 1 I haven't really seen bigger drsstc with helical primaries at all, unless having a pancake primary was more of the norm 5-10 years ago?

So my question is, are there any drawbacks from having a helical primary at this size I can't think of?

Good old Dr. Spark, which seems to have closed down his website, primarily built helical primary coils and they performed great!

Now I built a helical coil on my first DRSSTC for several reasons:
- To make the coil take up less space, smaller diameter
- I thought it was easier to make primary coil holders for this type compared to spiral
- Tapping was easier with cable just going up the side

I will avoid helical coils in the future for the following reasons:
- It has a high coupling that is harder to adjust/control
- It is much closer to the topload, so there is more strikes to ground rail
- It was a pain to wind the coil through the 4 sheets with too small holes, it took me hours to move it centimeters at a time as it kept locking itself in place
- There is no performance gain over spiral, for a DRSSTC

I would however still make round platforms with spiral primary coils, as I think they look great, but when you get up in size you really need a bigger base to stabilize the thing with wheels out in the corners of a box.

You could also go inbetween spiral and helical and make a upsidedown U shape primary if you want it to have a smaller diameter overall.

Looking forward to see what you decide on :)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on April 10, 2019, 09:49:46 AM
Cheers for the guidance Mads. Is having a upsidedown U primary the same calculation as a flat pancake?  I had a quick look at your drsstc that uses one, looks extremely nice.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on April 10, 2019, 12:21:20 PM
Cheers for the guidance Mads. Is having a upsidedown U primary the same calculation as a flat pancake?  I had a quick look at your drsstc that uses one, looks extremely nice.

I think I just went with a median value based on spiral coil and coupling as if it was a helical, but as you can see from the article on my website, I did a lot of measurements instead, as I could not calculate its specifications.

I guess you have to use something like FEMM in order to get a correct simulation as spiral/helical calculators and javatc does not support that primary form.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on May 01, 2019, 12:51:07 PM
i installed femm and straight away i was overwhelmed, i'm just too basic! so i'm going to do what i love doing.... trial and error!

i made small progress by cutting out the new base for the coil, i like it so much more than the square frame i put together! for the primary i've drawn up a basic shape in aspire and have given roughly 10mm spacing. at this point i'm trying to decide if i should have my mmc at 330nf or 165nf. It's been a while since i've had to recall but the lower capacitance means higher number of primary turns which would result in a lower achievable apk? i will have to re-read a few threads again to get my understanding back!

this is what the coil looks like now and the proposed primary, which is 50mm high and 100mm long. on the weekend i'll make a better effort to get some more in depth progress photos.
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]    
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on May 01, 2019, 10:12:25 PM
Looking good :)

I guess you can get away with just estimating that as a flat primary in JavaTC and it will not be too far off.

The higher MMC capacitance, the lower system impedance to a given resonant frequency. So yes that means higher peak currents, shorter on-time due to faster current ramp up etc. But it also gets more expensive to build due to increased cost on parts that can withstand the higher voltage/current. Higher impedance is cheaper to build but comes at the expense of greater switching losses due to longer on-time needed to produce long sparks.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 08, 2019, 03:57:17 PM
unfortunately I've been dormant for quite some time! other projects got in the way of dedicated coiling but now they're over i can get back into the swing of things!   

in my last update i made a mdf base and went with plywood primary supports. At the time i knew the supports weren't the best idea and i still wasn't happy with the base... it was time i changed the base again! which also brings me to distraction number one, a new cnc router! to me its a tool that i needed for many of my hobbies and will serve a great deal in coiling.

i wish i took photos during the design, cad and cutting but i didn't think ahead... i redesigned the base to be hex and made it out of plywood, i also made the primary supports out of polyethylene. I think once the base has been given a light stain the white from the mmc and primary supports as well as the primary and secondary should be appealing to the eye, not the most critical part of a drsstc but a part none the less. during the week i should have the coil wired up to begin testing, which is extremely overdue.
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]

 
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 12, 2019, 01:23:58 AM
Not that much has happened. A simple coupler between the primary and bridge output was made, at least with this info ever need to I can remove the primary easily. I think I also fou a place for the feedback/OCD CTS. I think I'll just make a simple bracket to remove any mechanical load. One thing that I'm.not sure about is if I have the gdt leads too long. I guess when I start testing I can always check the gate waveforms?
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on July 12, 2019, 09:56:38 AM
It looks very nice! Now that you went for the hexagon base, did you see the covering plates in the thread with the twin system? Where they sit into slots in the supports.

You should place your CTs at either output from the bridge, never between the primary coil and MMC, as you have a high voltage ringing between L and C.

Small progress is better than no progress! I am currently in a period of no progress, mostly due to starting on a new job and that takes all my mental capacity :)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 13, 2019, 03:48:54 PM
I love the idea of the covering plates and the simplicity of the wingnuts, I'm still unsure if I'm going to cover the electronics on mine though.

I think I have little time! I couldn't imagine your workload!

I got some light testing in tonight. One thing that I can't remember is switching times.. I'm going to have to ready your write-up again mads. Basically I'm getting turn on/off times of 1uS (1000ns?), Once I get better educated on switching times I can see if/what I'll have to change with the gdt. I'm also getting 5v overshoot, to me.this seems acceptable, but again it's something I'll have to read up on.

Another factor is that these tests were done without a topload so it will be interesting to see.if the lower frequency helps with the switching times.

Picture of gate waveforms for reference:
 [ Invalid Attachment ]


Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on July 14, 2019, 02:06:26 PM
You could properly need a slightly higher gate resistance to damp the overshoot, but generally that is a near perfect driving waveform for a IGBT gate. 10% overshoot would be perfect, 20% is borderline to too much, but okay!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 21, 2019, 03:25:02 PM
Cheers for.the suggestion mads, I might try add a resistor in series with the primary of the gdt, in the past it's worked well so hopefully it works here.

I've had some time this weekend to work on the coil. I rewound the inductor as it was off the mark for what I needed, I also made the (but not finished) the topload.... As well as first light! At the moment i haven't made any measurements besides setting the phase lead.

While running up.the coil to about 1/2the input voltage it struck my router and killed a stepper drive, so all tests will now be done outside.. pictures!
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on July 27, 2019, 08:35:33 PM
Congratulations on first light!

A real shame about killing a stepper driver on your CNC router, get some metallic net/chicken fence and throw over it, grounded and it should be safe :)

Your topload looks really cool, Russian design inspired I see, but the pieces of pipe covering 180 degrees seems to be too little when you have a sharp edge on the "outside" of the virtual toroid, so you have a break out elsewhere than from your breakout point. You properly need another 20-30 degree inwards in each end, so you need 240 degree pieces of pipe.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on July 28, 2019, 03:16:38 PM
Congratulations on first light!

A real shame about killing a stepper driver on your CNC router, get some metallic net/chicken fence and throw over it, grounded and it should be safe :)

Your topload looks really cool, Russian design inspired I see, but the pieces of pipe covering 180 degrees seems to be too little when you have a sharp edge on the "outside" of the virtual toroid, so you have a break out elsewhere than from your breakout point. You properly need another 20-30 degree inwards in each end, so you need 240 degree pieces of pipe.

Cheers, and yeah.. I've learnt my lesson with bigger coils now!

As for the topload I'm hoping I can cut out another radius and just bend it by hand with the t-pieces soldered on. I know it was another group that first put the topload out there, but it was Finn hammer that inspired me to do it.

In other news I ran the coil successfully tonight! Managed 1.6m streamers even with the topload situation. MMC was cool to the touch. The bridge was ever so slightly warm so I might just add active cooling just to be safe.
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 06, 2019, 05:11:10 AM
Small update. (Basically just to remind myself for the future!)

I got a 20a capable outlet installed for possible future builds, but this also means I can easily run a a higher current limit. I've now verified the bridge with 900a @ 100us on time. One major thing I must fix is the toroid. I'm going to cut out a concave radius and try to push each segment in to try and form a new radius, if that fails I'll have to unsolder the joins. Hopefully this weekend I'll get some decent pictures of my setup and some arcs.... I'm truly Hoping for near 2m

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: fnordest on August 06, 2019, 10:56:30 AM
Wow! Really nice, those sparks look amazing and the hexagonal base suites your coil very well :D
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 14, 2019, 04:39:11 AM
Wow! Really nice, those sparks look amazing and the hexagonal base suites your coil very well :D

Cheers,
 I'm pretty happy I went with a hexagonal base, definitely something I'll be using on future coils.

Another small update;
The ixys 40A 1200v bridge rectifier is dead! I ran the coil Hoping to get a few pictures and a video for the forum but unfortunately that couldn't happen. I'm not sure as to why it failed as the heatsink it's mounted to was barely luke warm (same heatsink as igbts). I've ordered a 150a 1600v bridge rectifier to replace it. When the fuse first blew I thought it was the bridge itself so I'm taking this as a win!

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on August 16, 2019, 10:34:46 PM
I must admit that I never put much thought into the bridge rectifers I have used, since they are mostly just grossly overrated, but when I have used some at a more proper rating, they have went up in smoke a few times. Just a quick guess that they might not the be fastest diodes and have a reverse recovery time that is too slow for DRSSTC transients?

You mentioned that your IGBTs heat sink got slightly warm on the first light run, how about your primary coil?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 19, 2019, 03:29:24 AM
Tbh I always just treated bridge rectifiers as "basic linear" devices, but I think you're onto it about transients. But there is also one more thing, the primary was struck by a streamer..... It actively avoided the strike ring!

As for the igbt heatsink getting warm, it's simply not good enough of me saying "slightly warm" or "barely luke warm". I'll get a probe on both next time I run it.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Netzpfuscher on August 19, 2019, 07:37:07 AM
I strongly suggest to use active cooling on the bridge. I calculated the numbers for my SKM400 coil. At 16% dutycycle with 1000A peak I have around 500W power dissipation.
The cooler you start your burst the more headroom you have to the max junction temperature.

That's the reason why my new coil has a big heat sink and a strong cooling fan. 
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Hydron on August 19, 2019, 10:44:35 AM
16% duty cycle is really high, is this with pulse-skipping and very long on-time?

As for the OP's bridge rectifier going pop, was it due to the streamer hit to the primary?
Commonly accepted practice is to tie one side of the DC bus to earth via a moderate value capacitor (e.g. 100nf), so that any current from a streamer strike has a low-impedance path to earth from the primary. The theory is that if this low-Z path is not present then you may run the risk of internal breakdown of the IGBTs or diode bridge to the earthed heatsink they are mounted to. Not sure how tested it is other than Steve Ward removing his strike ring and encouraging arcs to hit the primary of one of his coils (without any damage), but it does make sense as a theory!
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Netzpfuscher on August 19, 2019, 02:27:06 PM
Yes 16% is with pulse skipping and for SID files with 4 simultaneous voices. With this numbers I wanted to indicate that there is a fair amount of dissipation in a DRSSTC even at lower duty cycles.

The capacitor solution is a problem with RCDs, the high frequency ripple on the bus drives a current through the capacitor and this trips the RCD. I suggest to use two strings of TVS diodes from the inverter output to earth.  (6x 100V 1,5kW)
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 21, 2019, 03:59:47 AM
Cheers for the nudge to go active cooling @Netzpfuscher, I'll implement it when I replace the rectifier.

@Hydron the primary strike wasn't what killed the rectifier but I think it could have weakened/damaged it somehow, the failed when a greater input current was used.

Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on August 22, 2019, 09:32:24 PM
Even a electrostatic discharge can weaken a silicon-based component, so you could have a internal failure where the insulating layer between the copper base plate of the rectifier and its silicon die was broken down through a micro channel. Just a single small flash through and some burned goo or plastic and its done :(
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on August 29, 2019, 12:54:28 AM
With the toroid on my mind I set out to fix it. I tried bending each segment more to achieve a tighter radius but I still had sharp edges, to fix this I added copper rings to the top and bottom to cover them... And boy did it work! I'm getting almost 2m streamers now. There's still a bit of leakage but I think with a Polish and a coat of polyurethane it will fix the problem. I also think I might have the secondary too close to the primary, most of the time a ground strike is met with an arc from the bottom of the secondary to the primary. The first video is without the rings, the second video is with the rings.
/>
/> [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on August 30, 2019, 09:30:23 AM
Good that you see improvements! I watched the whole MIDI video, good stuff :)

Your coupling is too high or it is badly tuned when you get racing sparks, it can also be a insufficient grounding of the secondary coil.

I am actually not sure if varnishing the topload is a good idea, will it disrupt the electron charge and the toploads ability to have a surface capacitance, anyone can answer this?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Uspring on September 02, 2019, 12:09:49 PM
Quote
I am actually not sure if varnishing the topload is a good idea, will it disrupt the electron charge and the toploads ability to have a surface capacitance, anyone can answer this?

The varnish will have two properties. It will be a dielelectric and an insulator. As a dielelectric it will be polarised, causing an electric field opposite to that of the top load. Since it is a volume effect and the varnish probably thin, there will be a negligible increase of top load capacitance.

As an insulator, the varnish won't stop the appearance of an electric field around a charged up top load. Near points of high curvature, ionisation of the air will occur. If the top load is say, at a high positive voltage, the free electrons created will be attracted to and stick to the varnish and generate an electric field opposite to that of the top load. Eventually, this will stifle the ionisation.
But once the top load voltage reverses, the stuck electrons will increase the field and ionisation will start again. This time positive ions will stick to the varnish. So you will have some ionisation on each cycle.

Another way to see this is, that the varnish will act as an insulator of a capacitor, insulating the top load from a more or less conducting volume of air around it. And a capacitor is an AC conductor. The appearance of racing sparks along secondaries and primary secondary flash overs illustrate, that high frequency voltages don't really care about insulators. But they do help somewhat.

The long breakout rod you use is certainly a good idea. The breakout from there reduces the top load voltages. But the best option is to avoid sharp edges.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on September 03, 2019, 07:27:17 AM
Cheers for the info guys. I'll polish the top load and mess around with the tuning, I might even make some discs to lower the coupling if need be.

As it stands time is running out in this coil for the year, as summer approaches the days get longer so I won't be able to run the coil 😓
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on October 06, 2019, 04:31:55 PM
small update.

After trying for a while to get the spiral toroid working i finally listened to @Acid Byte. A quck trip to the hardware store and a few cuts on the cnc router later i had a new toroid! the diameter is 700mm with a height of 150mm. I also started to get working on the active cooling, it's simply a 3d printed box to house two hp server psu fans. I'm hoping to get some real runs in and fine tune the setup this upcoming friday... until then some pictures!

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on October 07, 2019, 12:37:44 PM
Nice sparks and also a nice looking coil, I am a total fan of secondary coil diameter and toroid topload minor diameter being the same!

You properly had to de-tune the primary some more? Noticeable enough to have higher peak current and thus getting longer sparks from a lower impedance system?
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on October 08, 2019, 12:56:35 AM
Cheers,
Yes the tuning changed quite a bit, I think something like 18khz or more. I still have fine tuning to go. To be honest I'm not sure what it would normally pull before as I had the OCD set to 900a.

One thing I've been thinking about making is essentially a vu metre for current, have the leds in 100a steps 🤔
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: Mads Barnkob on October 08, 2019, 12:22:54 PM
Cheers,
Yes the tuning changed quite a bit, I think something like 18khz or more. I still have fine tuning to go. To be honest I'm not sure what it would normally pull before as I had the OCD set to 900a.

One thing I've been thinking about making is essentially a vu metre for current, have the leds in 100a steps 🤔

I actually made such in 2011 and never finished the project :o It was based around a cheap DMM IC called ICL7017 and a VU meter IC, guess microcontrollers like Arduino surpassed that project by now. But it was meant to just be a homemade CT and a 0-2000A display + VU meter.
Title: Re: Drsstc 3
Post by: oneKone on October 23, 2019, 09:09:26 AM
Cheers,
Yes the tuning changed quite a bit, I think something like 18khz or more. I still have fine tuning to go. To be honest I'm not sure what it would normally pull before as I had the OCD set to 900a.

One thing I've been thinking about making is essentially a vu metre for current, have the leds in 100a steps 🤔

I actually made such in 2011 and never finished the project :o It was based around a cheap DMM IC called ICL7017 and a VU meter IC, guess microcontrollers like Arduino surpassed that project by now. But it was meant to just be a homemade CT and a 0-2000A display + VU meter.

If I ever get around to it I'll post it up, to me it's an easy way to see what's going on..


I think this might be the last update on this coil 🤷‍♂️.

Final OCD is set to 900a, pulling 15a arms from a 230v outlet @ 100us. I'm getting over 2m streamers at 100us, I'm tempted to push it but I'm also happy with the results. I'm also happy as this is the first drsstc build that I've done with an almost 100% success rate, with the bridge rectifier being the only part to fail!

All in all I'm happy and am keen to get onto my next builds. So far my upcoming builds will be a small 180khz skm100 fullbridge coil, and some gu50 tube projects! Ad well as the big dr project...... That's a lot on the horizon!!

Some pics:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]
 [ Invalid Attachment ]

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal